Skyworth, Konka | 'Discussion' | Fighting more | Will other home appliance manufacturers follow up?

Just in Shanghai, New York also knocked on the clock and listed a lot of spells. Before I even immersed myself in joy, I quickly fell into the whirlpool of negative public opinion such as 'fake goods' and 'cottage'.

Recently, RGB Electronics Co., Ltd., a well-known Chinese brand of Skyworth Group, issued a solemn statement, demanding that more and more sales be stopped. So, what are the attitudes of other well-known brand manufacturers on the fight?

According to the latest news, six law firms in the United States have announced that they will initiate class actions on behalf of investors.

Konka joins the 'votion' camp

On July 28th, RGB Electronics Co., Ltd. of Skyworth Group issued a solemn statement stating: 'My company is strictly related to 'Meng Duo Duo' and requires it to stop all the display and sales activities of counterfeit Skyworth TV products from now on. A lot of 'and all legal rights of the relevant infringer's liability.'

Subsequently, Konka also joined the 'condemnation' camp, Konka said: 'We have found that the counterfeit/infringing Konka TVs sold by many online stores on the 'Pan Duo Duo' platform include: Konka New, KONKIA Konka Little Prince, KONGIKA Konka Smart, etc. In order to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of consumers and our company, our company is closely related to 'too much', and requires it to order all online sales of counterfeit/infringing Konka TV products on its platform to stop relevant sales activities. Retain the right to pursue 'too much' and related infringement laws and economic responsibilities. '

Not only that, on the afternoon of August 2, Konka insiders also told the Daily Economic News reporter: 'For the products of counterfeit/infringing Konka on the platform, the company is already in the data collection stage, and it will be appropriate later. The timing is considering prosecution. '

In addition to the appearance of the old-fashioned home appliance manufacturers on the platform, the Internet company Xiaomi, which continues to expand its intelligent hardware, is no exception. Xiaomi's official website sells nearly 10,000 yuan for the 75-inch 'millet TV', which sells for more than 3,000 yuan, but ultimately consumes The products received by the company are 'Xiaomi Huiguang', 'Xingzhi Xiaomi', 'Xiaomi Le', 'Xiami Ejia' and other 'cottage' millet products.

On the afternoon of August 2, the reporter called Xiaomi on the above situation. A related person said that Xiaomi's online sales channels include Xiaomi Mall, Xiaomi Home, Xiaomi Youpin, Xiaomi Jingdong Official Flagship Store, Tmall Xiaomi Official Flagship Store. Suning Tesco Xiaomi official flagship store, Vipshop, does not currently include a lot of more, and Xiaomi official did not sell any related products on a multi-platform platform.

At the same time, the reporter also contacted Hisense, OPPO and vivo and other manufacturers, but as of press time, has not received the relevant party's response to the emergence of 'cottage' products.

'山寨' goods are still on sale

The national regulatory authorities also attach great importance to the relevant situation.

On August 1st, the website of the State Administration of Market Supervision said that the Director of the General Administration of the Internet has attached great importance to the issue of selling counterfeit and counterfeit goods on the platform of the media. The Shanghai Municipal Administration of Industry and Commerce has been asked to interview the platform operators and request Shanghai. And other relevant local industrial and commercial, market supervision departments, the media reflected, as well as consumers, trademark rights holders complained about the report on the multi-platform sales of 'cottage' products, 傍 brand and other issues, seriously carry out investigation and inspection, whether it is a third-party platform or Operators in the platform, as long as they constitute illegal, will be seriously dealt with according to law.

Subsequently, the company issued a statement on many aspects, saying that it will actively cooperate with industry and commerce, market supervision departments to carry out investigations, and further crack down on infringing counterfeit goods on the platform, and strive to meet the expectations of the society and consumers.

The reporter noticed that the 'cottage' products on the multi-platform platform have been greatly improved compared with the previous ones. 'Skyworth e-home', 'Chuangwei cloud audition', 'Xiaomi new product', 'Samsung audition technology' and other brands have been Line. So, does this mean that the 'cottage' brand has disappeared?

In fact, this is not the case. On the afternoon of August 2, after the reporter opened the iPad, I found that I confused the Konka brand's 'Kangjia Vision', confused the 'AOSIM' brand's 'AOSIMSI', and the vivo's 'vivk'. Products such as OPPO's 'OPPO A3' are still flooded with platforms.

The reporter randomly selected a TV called 'kktvU55v Konka' and asked the customer service of the platform merchant as a consumer. Is this TV available, whether it is produced by Konka. The customer responded that the TV is produced by Konka. When the reporter asked if it was a nationwide warranty, the customer service immediately sent another TV produced by Konka and said, 'This is Konka'.

In the store named 'Jiaxian Digital Life Museum', the reporter asked if a product with a price of 1448 yuan and the 'Genuine Smith Household Electric Water Heater' is in stock, why the price is lower than the market price. Customer service said, in stock, yes Factory direct sales (price will be cheaper). When the reporter consulted the origin of the product and whether it was a 'cottage' product, the customer service staff answered for nearly two hours: 'This is Shenzhen Smith, the warehouse just came to say that this is out of stock. . '

The reporter learned from many parties that August 1st of the US East, including Rosen Law Firm, Pomerantz LLP, Law Offices of Howard G. Smith, Faruqi & Faruqi LLP, The Schall Law Firm and Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC The law firm announced a class action lawsuit on behalf of corporate investors to recover the losses suffered by investors. Each law firm has a form link in its statement, inviting investors to buy more shares. Fill in the information and join the class action. On Wednesday night in Beijing time, the number of fights in the whirlpool of public opinion plunged 13% at the beginning of the session, and fell to 18.62 US dollars after the opening. As of press time, the US stocks fell 4.73% before the US stock market on Thursday. .

2016 GoodChinaBrand | ICP: 12011751 | China Exports