Weak patents, fake demand: some companies are keen on pseudo-innovation
Recently, the national high-tech enterprise Changlin Group has been concerned about the idling of the project, and the scientific research fraud has attracted public attention. The semi-monthly reporter survey found that in recent years, some enterprises have been wearing high-tech and innovative cloaks, and the pseudo-innovation of deception has repeatedly been banned. .
To tell the truth, more than 95% of the patents of our company are a piece of paper, and it is impossible to industrialize. ' A national high-tech enterprise, the person in charge of a well-known pharmaceutical company said. Enterprises spend a lot of human and financial resources every year, please write a 'write' And the purchase of patents. But this is often a weak patent with a lack of technical gold content, the quality is very low.
Half-monthly reporters contacted a patent agency recommended by the company to consult on the basis of purchasing patents. The other party admitted that it would cost about 20,000 yuan to purchase an invention patent, but it is not guaranteed to be industrialized. The procedures are complete. The business personnel also revealed that 70% of the patents on the company's platform are not industrialized.
A person in charge of a new industrial cluster base also shared the same opinion. He found that some small and micro enterprises have only two or three full-time R&D staff, but they are big patents. The office is full of various certificates, and the product categories are extremely rich. It is because of the savvy 'innovation' approach, some put a technical invention in 10 different application scenarios, and separately declare, there are ten patents, some are money-buying, 'even the patent name content says no Clear, purely image engineering'.
The person in charge also reflected that some companies simply “take it” and directly paste other people's products into their own brands, which are dubbed “brand-name innovation” in the industry. This phenomenon is particularly evident in the fields of drones, robots, etc. very.
'Not only with weak patent camouflage technology, but also good at fraud, exaggerating market demand and order volume to build momentum.' Just after an expert review of a technology company roadshow, some Internet innovations are not rooted in core technology. Is keen to over-hypocritical fake demand to play capital games.
'Digital impulse' disrupts innovation order
Entrepreneurs and university scholars admitted that the “digital impulses” reflected in patent applications and innovation project declarations have intensified in recent years, resulting in a group of so-called core technologies and innovations that can only be seen and cannot be used. Industrialization, disrupting the innovation order and damaging the atmosphere of innovation.
'Lack of original innovation, major innovation, not willing to take the hard work of the cold bench, but want to make quick money, engage in fast-food innovation.' In the eyes of experts, behind this hurricane, enterprises want to base high innovation 'Digital achievements', taking the funds of the national innovation policy, on the one hand, using the social mentality that emphasizes innovation, packaging itself to attract more market investment and orders.
For example, the person in charge of the above-mentioned pharmaceutical enterprises said that, for example, when the national high-tech enterprise is recognized and reviewed, it is clearly required that the declared enterprise has a certain number of invention patents, utility model patents or software copyrights, etc. However, due to the review form, the paper application materials are mainly Lack of multi-party verification of physical objects, some innovative speculations have been confusing. 'Even the intermediary industry chain, with special communication channels to help pseudo-innovation through censorship.'
An entrepreneur who has just left a well-known university has been arguing. Recently, he is busy writing a patent for a builder's friend. The other party does not care about writing, that is, he needs the patent 'squatting' to declare the project. 'So I racked my brains and will The artificial intelligence of the research, the new material direction combined with the construction industry, smashed two in the office. ' He said that as long as the text is well written, patents generally can't run.
Eliminate false fires and severely punish
Pseudo-innovation not only squeezes a large number of policy subsidies, but also dampens the innovators who are really hard-working, and also affects the objective understanding of scientific and technological progress by decision-making departments, dragging on the pace of innovation in China, and reducing the level of innovation and quality of the whole society.
'What is terrible is that companies are driven by digital impulses, interests, and mutual comparisons. Some policy and review loopholes allow pseudo-innovation circles to work, and this situation must be reversed as soon as possible. ' Respondents are deeply worried.
Experts said that the first thing to do is to increase the amount of patent gold from the source and transform the quantitative advantage of innovation into a quality advantage. On the one hand, strengthen the quality guidance of patent evaluation, improve the patent statistics release system, and increase the assessment and supervision of local patent quality; In terms of the current local awards for patent applicants, it is recommended to do a good job of screening and avoiding the phenomenon of patent applications passing through.
Entrepreneurs believe that when supporting innovative projects, it is urgent to establish a scientific evaluation selection mechanism to avoid 'going through the scenes' to 'shoot the head', such as increasing the review of research and development expenses in project funds, and increasing the field acceptance of products.
For the fraudulent behavior of OEM innovation, respondents believe that they should introduce punishment measures, include the involved enterprises in the declaration of innovation policies, blacklists for review of high-tech enterprises, and restrict their access to innovative financial support.