For the 'independent suspension and non-independent suspension who is better?' This classic question, the owners of netizens have been hotly discussing. Cylinder brother believes that for more than 150,000 models, the non-independent structure of the innate structure is clearly not independent Good. But for a family car of less than 150,000, is the independent suspension really better than the non-independent? There is no perfect structural design in the world, there are disadvantages in the advantages. Cylinder brother will come to talk to you this time. Talk, for a family car of less than 150,000, who is better off independent suspension and torsion beam suspension?
What is the definition of independent suspension and torsion beam?
First of all, before the comparison, we have to figure out what is the independent suspension and the non-independent suspension. The so-called non-independent suspension is in the vernacular, that the wheels on both sides are connected by an integral frame, and the non-independent suspension is from the bottom. The big stick is the same. The independent suspension is the opposite. The wheels on each side are individually suspended by the elastic suspension system under the frame or the body. If you still don't understand it, you can directly express it.
Structurally, independent suspension has inherent advantages
As I said at the beginning of the article, independent suspension has an inherent advantage over non-independent suspension. Because the non-independent suspension is a whole, if the left wheel encounters a bump, it will affect the right wheel through the non-independent suspension, just like human The left and right feet are fixed together with a stick. As a result, the comfort and grip of the non-independent suspension models will be significantly insufficient.
In contrast, the independent suspension can keep the left and right wheels alone, and the bumps will not affect each other. Comfort and grip are better than non-independent suspension.
Non-independent suspension also has advantages: cheap, no land
Non-independent suspensions have many advantages, but they also have many advantages. First, non-independent suspensions can make room for the rear row and the trunk. For example, although the non-independent old LaVida is smaller than the independent suspension of the Fox, after the actual In terms of space performance, LaVida is greater than Fox. The second point is that because the non-independent suspension structure is simple, the factory assembly is relatively easy, and the cost is naturally low. In contrast, non-independent suspension models have always been cheaper than independent suspension models. Point, maintenance costs are also low.
So far, the approximate difference between the two must be known to everyone. There may already be many people who think that no matter what car they buy, the car that is independently suspended is better than the car that is not independently suspended. Buying a car must buy an independent suspension model. If you really think so, it would be a big mistake. Cylinder brother must correct some of your misconceptions!
Non-independently suspended cars must not match the independent suspension models in terms of handling and comfort? -NO!
First of all, the front of the cylinder is only about the advantages and disadvantages of the structure, and the comfort of the real car is affected by many aspects besides the suspension. For example, the connection point between the rear suspension and the body determines the body. Stability. Or the damping capacity of the shock absorber, also determines the 80% of the filter level of the car.
Rear suspension of Renault Megane RS
Even non-independent suspensions have various differences. For example, non-independent suspensions with high strength of suspension materials do not require a push rod or stabilizer bar for lateral positioning. This also maximizes handling while maintaining controllability. The space is increased. Moreover, the non-independent suspension beam is close to the body connection point, and the suspension exhibits more comfortable features.
Suspended by the owner’s chopsticks (double-link suspension)
Cylinder brother believes that for the family car of less than 150,000, the platform and materials of the platform training are far more important than the suspension of the infrastructure. Recently, Cang brother saw that 'the independent brand is less than 100,000 standard independent suspension, very conscience' and the like. The article feels very ridiculous, this is completely misleading consumers. Some of the second and third-line independent brands completely ignore the characteristics of the frame, the three-link independent suspension of free training, in the end is rubbish. Like the previous cottage phone, how can function? The use is not a mess. The tens of thousands of independent suspension models will not be better than the hundreds of thousands of non-independent suspension models. Cylinders advise consumers not to blindly choose independent suspension models, you do not understand In the case of the comfort of the car, the best way is to test drive once, or ask Cylinder.
For the choice of non-independent suspension and independent suspension models of the same price, I think it is mainly to look at the needs of the owners. If it is not often bad roads, most driving roads are still in the city, there is no need to sacrifice space and money to choose independent suspension. Models. Or you don't have to care too much about whether to use independent suspension. If you wear less than 150,000, it is a family car. If you really have high comfort requirements, save about 10,000 sets of good shock absorbers for comfort. Will be more obvious.
