Intel CEO Brian Krzanich, who is now facing a 50-year chief executive insuring in the face of a long-standing lack of successors in the company, is likely to take a mobile response that has not been seen before, while the new CEO will be in a tough battle to bring Intel back to its former glory. . Krzanich is in breach of Intel rules and contacts, although the relationship has ended, but after the company launched an investigation, Krzanich decided to resign on 21st. The Krzanich-dipping chip industry, an experienced veteran who has been at Intel for the first time since entering the 36, was the 6th executive, and surprisingly ended up stepping down in an honorable way. Krzanich to eliminate the threat of their status of the dissidents, several previously regarded as the successor of the executive has been separated, including the former president of the manufacturing business Stacy Smith, former chief of Operations Renee James, the source of the former head of the cause of the director Diane Bryant, And head of the PC business, Kirk Skaugen. As a result, there is almost no suitable CEO replacement within Intel, which is a tricky issue for Intel, as the CEOs are promoted from within. Intel appears to be trying to downplay the CEO overhang, saying it has a perfect succession plan and is already looking for a successor outside the company. However, when Paul Otellini, before Krzanich, left office in 2012, Intel had indicated that it would seek replacements from the outside, but it decided to elect from Krzanich, James and Smith, later by Krzanich get picked. James finally left Intel to start the chip start-ups Ampere Computing, Smith retired at the end of January. Market Watch analysis points out that the decision at that time seemed not a good choice for Intel. Krzanich, in addition to the embarrassing way to step down, during his long tenure, Intel has been defeated, in addition to the first time behind the process, the world's largest chip manufacturing plant to the status of Samsung Electronics (Samsung Electronics), the core chip architecture is a major flaw ( Krzanich also suspected of selling Intel shares before the news was public. In addition, Intel is behind rival Nvidia and AMD in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. Analysts have described Krzanich's missteps as a book. Intel, for its own sake, is likely to raise the possibility of a successor from outside, presumably inviting James to make a comeback, and if so, she will be Intel's first female executive. But some analysts believe that James is an important director of Ampere Computing, a new venture, and that the chances of returning to Intel are slim, and that a more likely successor is Bryant. On the other hand, the internally considered successors are Krzanich who have been brought in from other companies in the past few years, not very well qualified at Intel, including the former Qualcomm (QUALCOMM) Director Venkata Renduchintala, and the Financial Secretary Bob Swan, Swan was appointed as the interim chief executive after Krzanich resigned. Whoever is in the final seat will shoulder the heavy responsibility of bringing Intel back to glory. Analysts say Intel will then need a leader with experience in chip-architecture engineering, rather than a krzanich-like manufacturing experience. The new CEO is also committed to securing Intel's leading position in the data center market, finding ways to conquer the mobile market, consolidating a range of mergers and acquisitions, and expanding into new markets such as auto parts and the so-called IoT (IoT). However, despite the controversy over the success or failure of Krzanich's leadership of Intel, it is no doubt that Intel's performance continued to grow during his 5-year tenure, even as the main battlefield PC market became miniaturized. 2012, Intel revenue of 53.3 billion U.S. dollars, non-GAAP estimated earnings per share of 2.13 U.S. dollars, analysts estimate 2018 revenue will be 67.6 billion U.S. dollars, of which 3 billion U.S. dollars from the acquisition of Altera and Mobileye contribution, a surplus of 3.87 U.S. dollars per share.
