According to Lenovo, at the 86th meeting, all participating companies had no objection to the use of LDPC for data channel long codes, and the opinions on the data channel short code remained inconsistent. Therefore, this meeting only used LDPC for data channels. The code reached a resolution.
In consideration of its own technology and patent reserves, Lenovo and Motorola Mobile have supported Samsung (not Qualcomm) to adopt LDPC as the only encoding scheme for eMBB data channels. However, Lenovo’s position has not played a decisive role in the outcome of the conference. In effect, the two votes of Lenovo and Motorola Mobile have no material effect on the loss of the Polar code over the long channel of the data channel.
At the 87th meeting, Lenovo gave full support to the Polar code. The Polar code was used for the data channel short code and the Polar code for the control channel scheme. Both voted in favor.
According to Lenovo, Lenovo will reserve the right to take legal actions against any misrepresentation or misrepresentation and misrepresentation of the public.
The following is the full text of the statement:
The brief facts about Lenovo voting at the 3GPP 5G channel coding international conference
1. At the #86bis conference held in Lisbon, because there were many companies that objected to each proposal, all the proposals could not be passed as they were. According to the working principles of 3GPP, the chairperson of the conference room could have common points in all the proposals (ie, no The objectionable part was decided as the final resolution. As at this meeting, all the participating companies (including Chinese companies) had no objection to the use of LDPC for data channel long codes, and the opinions on the data channel short code were still inconclusive. , So this meeting finally reached a resolution on the long code for data channel used by LDPC.
2. At the #86bis conference in Lisbon, Lenovo and Motorola Mobile, for their own technical and patent reserve considerations, supported Samsung (not Netcom's Qualcomm) to lead the adoption of LDPC as the only encoding scheme for the eMBB data channel. But Lenovo’s position, and There was no decisive effect on the outcome of the meeting. The two votes of Lenovo and Motorola Mobile had no material effect on the loss of the Polar code over the long channel of the data channel. The 3GPP approach was to achieve consensus. A proposal was passed, the only The requirement is that there is no company objection, not how many companies agree.
3. At the #87 conference held in Reno, USA, as previously stated, Lenovo gave Polar code full support. Polar code is used for data channel short code, and Polar code is used for control channel scheme. Both have voted in favor. .
4. The right to speak of 5G is the core number of patents that have finally been approved. 5G technology, including patents in Polar code and LDPC code, is the result of the convergence of multiple companies. You have me, and I have you. Polar code is finally part of the 5G standard and we are very pleased.
5. Although channel coding is an important part of the 5G development, the 5G contest has only just begun. Lenovo actively participates in the formulation of the 5G standard and continues to support the development of China's 5G technology and industry as always.
For any distorted facts, malicious attacks and misleading reports and statements to the public, Lenovo will retain the right to take legal action.
