LeTV.com claimed that in the company's sued case, because the larger part of the case had not yet been heard, the company could not accurately determine whether it would affect the company's current profit or future profits.
It is understood that in the case of LeTV.com as the plaintiff, the defendants included Xiaomi Technology Co., Ltd., and Beijing Fengxing Online Technology Co., Ltd. and other internet counterparts. In the case of the rights defending case where the two defendants were jointly filed, the amount involved was 5162. In addition, Zhejiang Huayi Brothers Film Industry Investment Co., Ltd. was listed as a defendant in two lawsuits by LeTV. The case was all a copyright license contract, involving a total amount of 2.55 million yuan.
In addition, the former LeTV's Internet car brand Yi Yi was also on the list of lawsuits, including Beijing Dongfang Cheyun Information Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing Yizhi Travel Service Co., Ltd., and Yidao Travel Agency (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. As defendants, all involved in the sale and purchase contract disputes involved a total of 138 million yuan, which is LeTV.com as the plaintiff involved in the highest amount of litigation.
In addition to these six lawsuits, LeTV and its affiliated companies were listed as defendants in the remaining 192 lawsuits. The plaintiffs included not only China Unicom, China Mobile, China Telecom, IBM, CITIC Bank, SF Express, and other large companies. There are also five-star sports media, optical media, mango entertainment and other film and television companies, as well as a large number of advertising, exhibitions, and cultural and creative companies. In these lawsuits, the defendant also included Lemax Electronic Technology (Tianjin) Limited in addition to LeTV. The company, Levision Cloud Computing Co., Ltd., Horgos Lele as the New Generation Culture Media Co., Ltd. etc.
The larger amounts involved include the previously-disclosed contract disputes between Xinli Electronics Co., Ltd. and Le Rongzhixin Electronic Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. and other defendants. The litigation involved a total of RMB 240 million.