Yesterday, Liang Ning wrote “A recount of the past about domestic chips and operating systems” in the circle of friends. It was a gentleman of Ni Guangnan, a gentleman, but he also reflected the biggest drawback of China’s development of the IC industry: Expert responsibility system.
After nearly 20 years of acquaintance with Academician Ni, academician Ni’s honesty and admiration for his career admired. However, as a participant of Lenovo NC (Network Computer) that year, Fangzhou 1 was destined to be a failed case. I believe that he participated in the NC project that year. The industry is well aware of this, but unfortunately, there are still many experts still advocating a general-purpose processor program that simply cannot create an industrial ecology.
From 909, 863 to the current major projects, the system of expert responsibility has always been responsible for the development of China's integrated circuit industry. Perhaps these experts are the most well-known professors in China's integrated circuit industry, but academics and industry have always been separated by two yin and yang. In the big camp, professors can be consultants in the industry and can only be consultants.
The direct result of the expert responsibility system is technological determinism. Although technology plays a significant role in the process of industrial development, it is never a determinant of the final industry trend.
From Ark No. 1 to many cores such as Godson, Siucore, etc., the state has been supporting for nearly 20 years. The slogan is exactly the same as the previous year. The effect cannot be said to be no. Dream is still a dream.
ARM is now running mobile terminal processors, not Europe and the United States government's strong support, but then Nokia in order to self-developed mobile phone chip selected from a variety of processor cores, if that year Nokia selected MIPS, SH4 or any other architecture, Perhaps ARM has long disappeared.
Choosing which kind of technical specifications is often the casual leader’s accidental decision, or the balance between several overlords, it is difficult for the government or academia to influence the trend of industrial technology.
Even the WAPI and TD SCDMA, which the Chinese government strongly dominates and enjoys, are also the same.
China supports autonomous OS for more than 20 years. First, it wants to break the monopoly of Windows. Then it breaks the monopoly of Android. As everyone knows, Android is just a son bought by Google. It is not the monopoly of the United States that formed the present monopoly. Android can monopolize market operations completely. The product.
How hard is it to create an eco-friendly environment? As powerful as Intel spends billions of dollars to challenge the Android ecosystem, it's just as good as it gets.
The IEEE International Solid-State Circuit Summit held in the United States in February this year employed 202 papers. The Mainland, Hong Kong, and Macau employed the most 14 papers of all time, including 7 papers from the University of Macau and 2 from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 2 The first article from Fudan University, Peking University and Chengdu University of Electronic Technology was first accepted by ISSCC. This is the true level of the global chip Olympic Games in mainland China. It is still the best one.
Academically, it is even less than Macau. Experts in mainland China control the dominance of massive funds and control the future planning and deployment of the mainland's integrated circuit industry.
Because experts are in charge, many industrial research funds in China are overly inclined toward universities and research institutes, and they are engaged in practical technology research that should have been led by companies. However, forward-looking technology research of China's IC companies is difficult to start because of financial difficulties.
Because the experts are in the spot, the mainland has emerged many entrepreneurial companies that rely exclusively on government funds for survival. Many of those companies that have performed well in the market have been kept out of the door because they are unwilling to barter experts;
Because the experts are in charge, many professors do not feel at ease doing academic work, but they want to become experts because once they become experts, they will become the object of envy and sympathy for everyone, far more glorious than academic success.
The system of expert responsibility has become the biggest drawback that restricts the development of integrated circuits in China. If the system is not reformed, it will seriously hinder the development of China's integrated circuit industry. (Laowei Micro Signal: laoyaoshow)
2. Core technology from running to running and running Powerful nations need to build ecosystems;
Reporter Chen Baoliang Beijing Reports New Engine of Digital Economy
In 2014, China proposed the construction of an Internet powerhouse, and subsequently introduced a series of policies and measures to support the construction of an Internet powerhouse. In the past four years, China has been a core technology in integrated circuits, operating systems, network security, artificial intelligence, and quantum computing. The fields have made continuous progress and breakthroughs, and gradually realized the accumulation and development of technology and talents. They have also achieved recognition and cooperation in China and the international Internet-trust industry chain. However, China still has shortcomings in the core technology field, and it still needs to be broken through. At the level of network ecosystem construction, China's progress has been slow.
From an economic point of view, China’s digital economy, which is based on information and digitization, has experienced rapid growth. Data show that in 2017 China’s digital economy reached 27.2 trillion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 20.3%, accounting for 32.9% of GDP, and the digital economy. Accelerated integration with the real economy. With the continuous advancement and deepening of digital China construction, in the future, digital technology innovation represented by 5G, IoT, cloud computing, and AI will bring prosperity to all industries and drive the digital economy and entities. Further economic growth. (Zhang Xing)
After more than three years of integration and restructuring, a number of leading companies have emerged in the domestic integrated circuit industry, such as the Ziguang Group in the design field, Huawei, the North Huachuang in the equipment industry, China Microelectronics, SMIC in the chip manufacturing industry, and packaging and testing. In addition to semiconductor equipment, Jiangsu Changjiang Electronics, the above-mentioned companies are among the top ten in the world. In 2016, McKinsey, an international consulting agency, analyzed that 'Chinese semiconductor companies are expected to lead the world in the next decade'. National Cyber Security and The informatization work conference was held in Beijing from the 20th to the 21st. He stressed that 'Keeping abreast of the historical opportunities in the development of informatization, independent innovation promotes the construction of powerful countries on the Internet'.
In February 2014, for the first time at the first meeting of the Central Cyber Security and Informationization Leading Group, a strategy for strengthening the country’s network was proposed, stating that 'no national security is possible without network security' and that 'we will work hard to build our country into an Internet powerhouse'; 2016 On April 19, he delivered a speech at the online letter work forum, stating that 'the core technology of the Internet is our biggest 'gate of life', the core technology is controlled by people is our biggest hidden danger', 'to protect Internet security and national security, we must break through. Core technology this problem'.
Over the past four years, China has made progress in core technologies such as integrated circuits, operating systems, cyber offense and defense security, artificial intelligence, and quantum computing, and has made breakthroughs in the gradual realization of technology, talent accumulation, and development. It is also in China and the international Internet industry. Chain recognition and cooperation, of course, have also encountered competition and blockade from technology-dominated countries, enterprises.
Nowadays, 'China has evolved from being the original player in the field of cyberspace to running and running'. On April 23, when interviewed by a reporter from the 21st Century Business Herald, Academician Ni Guangnan of the Chinese Academy of Engineering said, 'Relying on China’s huge human resources and The market advantage, concentrate on the power to do big things, can solve the problem that the core technology is controlled by people as soon as possible.
Core technology runs from and to
The core technologies in the field of cyberspace are divided into three areas: first, basic technology, general technology, second, asymmetric technology, 'killer' technology, and third, cutting-edge technology, disruptive technology. Basic and general technologies mainly include integrated circuits and operations. System, this is the focus of our country's core technology controlled by people, and it is also the most urgent problem that our country needs to concentrate on breakthrough.
In recent years, China has successively introduced policies and support measures for the development of the integrated circuit industry, such as the National Outline Program for the Integrated Circuit Industry and the National Integrated Circuit Industry Fund.
According to an excerpt from the “Review of Scientific and Technological Innovations” published by the Central Literature Publishing House, in a written opinion on a proposal of the Chinese Academy of Engineering on December 20, 2013, it was pointed out that the importance of information technology core technologies and information infrastructure such as computer operating systems is obvious. , We must solve people’s problems in some key technologies and equipments early.” 'We must increase our independent innovation efforts, focus our strengths on collaborative research, and make breakthroughs, so that we can promote our efforts in order to ensure information security and national security.' .
It is necessary to point out that as early as the country formulated the "National Outline for Medium- and Long-Term Scientific and Technological Development Planning (2006-2020)", it established a major project for the development of 'core electronic devices, high-end general-purpose chips and basic software products'. This special project was called This is a 'nuclear high base'. However, due to national funds, policies have not been able to concentrate their efforts. This has led to the development of a number of domestic integrated circuits and basic hardware and software companies in China, but it has not cultivated a competitive ability and can drive Leading company in the industry.
After 2014, the domestic IC industry launched large-scale mergers and acquisitions, integration, investment, and restructuring. Among them, the national integrated circuit industry fund with a total value of RMB 140 billion has invested nearly 70 times in the past three years, with a total investment of RMB 120 billion. , And the investment made by social capital is much higher than this.
After more than three years of integration and restructuring, a number of leading companies have emerged in the domestic integrated circuit industry, such as the Ziguang Group in the design field, Huawei, the North Huachuang in the equipment industry, China Microelectronics, SMIC in the chip manufacturing industry, and packaging and testing. In addition to semiconductor equipment, Jiangsu Changjiang Electronics has been ranked among the top ten global companies in its field.
In the area of information infrastructure such as the operating system, several government departments have started piloting a safe and controllable information technology system with independent innovation as the core. This system includes numerous domestic Linux operating systems, Godson, Feiteng, and Shenwei-based CPUs. , Dameng, Nantong, the database provided by the People's Congress of Jincang, the middleware of Dongfangtong, Kingdee and other companies, the WPS office software of Jinshan, and the virtualization, security products, and domestic security provided by Huawei, Xinhua, Shenzhen, Chaoxin, etc. The controllable industrial development goal is to replace the Wintel ecosystem of the monopoly desktop technology system.
On October 9, 2016, during the 36th collective learning session of the Politburo, the Central Political Bureau stressed that 'We must step up our breakthrough in the development of cutting-edge technologies and key core technologies with international competitiveness, accelerate the development of domestically controlled and controlled alternatives, and build safety. Controlled information technology system. '
At present, China’s largest pilot project for safe and controllable information technology is the “Controlled Alternative Plan” of the China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation - 'Commercial Network'. Ni Guangnan told reporters that the number of registered users of the commercial network has reached 40,000 and 40,000 terminals There are 28,000 computers based on domestic CPUs and domestic operating systems. The data centers that provide cloud services have also mainly relied on domestic hardware and software. The system has been operating stably for more than two years, and the actual user experience is similar to systems based on foreign software and hardware. , 'Home-made hardware and software have reached a level of availability, independent and controlled alternative programs are feasible. Now replacing Wintel system is easier than ever.'
Breaking ecosystem
However, in the field of information technology, there is still an ecosystem gap between technological breakthroughs, industry maturity, and market leadership.
The mature ecosystem has a natural monopolistic competitiveness.
In the face of the Wintel system, Google’s operating system is difficult to gain. It eventually found a breakthrough on emerging mobile devices, opening up Andriod, and the Chrome OS of the tablet PC. After the AA (Andriod+ARM) system was established, Microsoft developed. The WP mobile operating system can only be defeated, and its market share is even less than one-thousandth. The Samsung, the world's largest smartphone maker, tried to develop a mobile operating system and ended in failure. It finally chose to develop a Tizen system for the Internet of Things.
At present, Linux-made operating systems account for about 3% of the government procurement market, and the remaining 97% are still Windows operating systems. The products of the domestic information system were not initially considered in terms of ecosystem considerations. Recently, a A domestic software source told the reporter, 'Although everyone can develop all localized technologies and products based on Wintel's architecture, they cannot form an ecological system. There is no market at the beginning, and there is no opportunity for everyone to make an ecological attempt.' In 2013-2014, when products of domestic information companies first built a safe and controllable system, when they first came together, the application experience was extremely poor, and even the startup was problematic, but after intercommunicating and debugging, they quickly reached The 'available' level is currently transitioning from 'available' to 'useful'. '
However, the construction of the ecosystem is not just an 'interoperability test' between products, but more about the combination of strengths and strengths of companies and organizations, and collaborative research. However, the above-mentioned sources told reporters: 'The competition among domestic companies is greater than that of collaboration. After the rise of the safe and controllable market, major corporations and agencies began to 'hug each other'. Different groups were mutually exclusive and very obvious.
Over the past three years, the domestic security-controlling industry has gradually formed a number of alliances, mainly the four major groups of the Chinese Electronics Department, the Chinese Electronics Department, the Chinese Department of Science, and the Department of Aerospace Science and Industry. The above-mentioned industry sources told the reporter. 'At present, everyone's market mainly depends on the government's office area, but even in this relatively small market, different companies are still mutually exclusive.'
It should be pointed out that although the two core technologies of integrated circuits and operating systems are simultaneously breaking through, there has not been a large-scale merger and reorganization of similar integrated circuits in the operating system field. The current 'landscapes' are not conducive to the construction of an ecological system.
In his speech on April 19th, 2016, he pointed out, 'We have a wide gap in the core technology with the international advanced level. One of the most prominent reasons is that our backbone enterprises have not formed a synergy like Microsoft, Intel, Google, and Apple. Effect. The United States has a so-called 'Wentailai' alliance. Microsoft's Windows operating system is only paired with Intel's chips. In terms of core technology research and development, strong alliances are better than single-play. It is necessary to come up with some solutions in this regard. We must completely break away from the shackles of departmental interests and portal views. Holding an idea that is rather a chicken's head and not being an phoenix's tail, holding the idea of owning an acre of one-third of the ground, cannot form a concerted effort. It is difficult to achieve success.
3. 9. Experts vocalize the ZTE incident: Do not blindly arrogantly claim to be incapable of arrogance; say no to technological hegemony;
Original title: Heavy | Nine experts collectively vocalize the ZTE incident: not blindly arrogant, can not be arrogant, must firmly say to the hegemony of technology!
Recently, the ban on ZTE USA continued to ferment, various reflections on various viewpoints filled it, and the Chinese communication industry had nothing to do with its success. To disentangle the layers of fog and return to the communications industry itself, how should we stand in the perspective of technology and industry? Examining this incident and the industry reality reflected behind it, the Communications Industry News (Net) interviewed nine experts, presenting insights and insights from big coffee inside and outside the industry.
01 Ni Guangnan, an Academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, is a key core technology and can neither rely on foreign countries nor believe in introduction.
ZTE’s ban on the United States has sparked widespread thinking about 'mindlessness and lack of soul' and independent innovation. For a long time, Academician Ni Guangnan of the Chinese Academy of Engineering who actively advocated independent innovation in the field of information and communications has stated that new technologies emerge in the field of cyberspace, but CPUs and The status of OS as a basic core remains unchanged, and other core technologies are often built on them. If China does not have an autonomous OS and CPU, it will not be able to become an information power and cyber power, and it will be impossible to maintain national cyberspace sovereignty, security, and security. Development benefits. So despite GPS, China still has to develop BeiDou; despite windows, Android and iOS, China still has to develop OS.
Ni Guangnan pointed out that the ZTE incident exposed the problems that we were subjected to in the key core technologies and equipment and must be solved as soon as possible. In key core technologies, we must not rely on foreign countries and cannot believe in introduction. Only the development of two bombs and one star and the spirit of aerospace can be carried out. , increase the independent innovation efforts can be resolved. (Reporter: Kang Jialin)
02 Gao Xudong, deputy director of the Center for Technological Innovation and Research of Tsinghua University, is not conducive to the global communications industry
Gao Xudong, deputy director of the Center for Technology Innovation and Research at Tsinghua University, pointed out that with the deepening of economic globalization, the relationship between global communications companies has become very close. The US sanctions against ZTE will not only negatively affect ZTE and China’s communications industry, but also It will cause certain losses to the US and the global communications industry. At the same time, Gao Xudong emphasized that whether it is a state-controlled holding company, or a private enterprise, Huawei, or a state-owned enterprise, Shang Fei, which produces the C919, is an important strategic strategy for China. Enterprises. The U.S. sanctions are a serious interference with China’s interests. The Chinese side should give a harder response. (Reporter: Tan Lun)
03 Liu Quan, a director of the Cyber Security Institute’s Cyber Security Institute, confirmed China’s core technology investment
According to Liu Quan, director of the Cyber Security Institute’s Cyber Security Institute, the ZTE event is not an isolated incident but should be understood in the context of Sino-American competition. Liu Quan said that with the Chinese national strength, especially in the field of science and technology As a result of the tremendous increase in force, the threatened sense of the United States as a garrison has also increased. The friction between the two is unavoidable. The incident of ZTE's sanction is an inevitable result of this background.
Liu Quan said that in recent years, the industry has always had two voices of “independent development” and “introduction and digestion” in the development of China’s IT core technology. However, ZTE's sanction by the United States undoubtedly gave the most clear response to this disagreement: China must Actively and vigorously rely on its own strength to develop IT core technologies and products. As emphasized at the National Cyber Security and Informatization Conference recently, core technologies are the top priority for the country. We must resolve, maintain perseverance, focus on accuracy, and accelerate the promotion of the information field. Breakthrough in core technology. Liu Quan said that the ZTE event has strengthened China's determination to increase investment in core technology fields and will certainly have a very important significance for China's science and technology industry. (Reporter: Tan Lun)
04 'TD Iron Man', Senior Engineer Li Jinliang of China Electronics Technology Group pays attention to multiple supply and avoids 'exclusive dependence'
'TD Iron Man', senior engineer of the China Electronics Engineering Group, Li Jinliang pointed out that information technology is the most open industry in the world. Countries all over the world are developing information technology, leading to the global distribution of the industry chain, and no country can complete it on its own. The relations between the major economies have become increasingly closer. The ecology of “I have you, you have me” has gradually formed. The brand products of a country, its parts and components come from many countries around the world, the international cooperation of the communications industry, supply, The division of labor and cooperation in the high-tech ecology is the norm of the industry. A company can't 'make the world'. Although the United States is the world leader in some areas, it is no exception.
Li Jinliang believes that apart from the recent media emphasis on developing self-research chips to get rid of dependence, ZTE needs to pay attention to diversified supply in the industrial chain cooperation policy and avoid 'exclusive reliance'. Globally preferred suppliers can disperse supply risks. Therefore, it is recommended that ZTE shall list all the currently normal production series and the series of products under development, and list all the parts, commodities, software and technology imported from the United States, and list the domestic supply that can be replaced according to the principle of multiple supply. And the list of parts, commodities, software and technology imported by other countries, so that there will inevitably be a large proportion of ZTE's products that will not be affected by the US ban, but will analyze the research measures of the small part of the affected ZTE products. It is necessary to give full play to the subjective initiative of 80,000 employees of ZTE, or to change the design. Another way is not to use U.S. spare parts, or to start research immediately in China. ZTE also needs to strengthen its localization procurement. (Reporter: Gao Chao)
05 Wu Jinxi, Director of Strategic Emerging Industry Research Center, Tsinghua University, Cannot Neglect Chinese Communications Technology Innovation
The ZTE incident reflected the pain of China's 'core deficiencies' and even triggered reflections on independent technological innovation. Wu Jinxi, director of the Strategic Emerging Industry Research Center at Tsinghua University, said that it cannot completely deny the achievements of technological innovation in China's communications industry. ICT-contained The industry is very extensive, and chips and semiconductor devices used in communications are not a concept.
It is understood that ZTE's core chips in 5G, optical transmission, mobile phones, optical cats, and set-top boxes, especially high-end core routers, are designed by ZTE itself, especially the 5G core chip.
Wu Jinxi stated that ZTE, as one of the two high-tech flags of the country, cannot collapse. He believes that if ZTE falls, it will be a loss for the entire communications industry chain and even the economy. Wu Jinxi said that the Trump administration is targeting China’s strategic new industries. , ZTE became a victim in the context of China's continuous manufacturing of 2025.
However, we also need to face up to our country's objective problems. Wu Jinxi pointed out that the country had previously listed semiconductors as 19 major projects to invest. 'But investment is not enough, and the country's R&D investment is not as good as that of an Intel company'. He said , 'This industry has changed a lot, it is a spider web structure distribution.'
At present, the Taiwanese company represented by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TSMC) is the leader in processing and manufacturing, and the design software is headed by the United States. If China starts to catch up now, it will take ten years.
However, there are also domestic companies that have begun to take action. It is understood that Ziguang and the Wuhan government have cooperated to establish a research and development of memory chips. This year, it will be trial run and mass production will start next year. 'Mass production is a difficult point, because chips are used as precision products, and the current defective rate is relatively high. '(Reporter: Zhao Wei)
06 Shu Huaying, professor of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, is the only way to start from the basics
Shu Huaying, a professor at Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, said that operating software and integrated circuits have always been the weakness of China’s information technology. In terms of integrated circuits, China’s imports have reached hundreds of billions of dollars each year. In terms of operating software, China still does not have a fully independent R&D system. Software with good universal applicability, these technical defects indicate that we have problems in enterprise management. Aside from the interests of the enterprise, we must correct our attitude toward core technologies.
According to the report of the “Communications Industry” (Net) reporter, global chip sales exceeded 400 billion U.S. dollars in 2017, and China’s chip imports exceeded 260 billion U.S. dollars. This shows that China’s demand for chips is extremely large. In contrast, on the supply side, the self-sufficiency ratio of China’s chips is only More than a dozen percent, from this perspective, the development of core technologies is also a 'required course' in China.
Shu Huaying believes that to stand by the forests of the nations of the world, we must develop our own core technologies to avoid being stuck on the neck of others in the industry chain. Starting from the foundation is the only way to develop core technology. Frozen feet are not a day. In the cold, China's gap on the chip can not be caught overnight. 'The development of the chip in China has been a long time, but this is a long-term accumulation process, can not be resolved in a short period of time, is a long-term strategy.' Shu Huaying Said.
In this regard, Shu Huaying suggested that in the development of chips, private enterprises and state-owned enterprises should first attach importance to common development; Secondly, under the support of national policies, domestic chip companies should create a favorable market development environment and provide product iteration opportunities. In the end, companies must develop collaboratively in an integrated manner, and they should not only care about their immediate interests and disregard long-term strategic interests.
In the ZTE incident, we should even sound the alarm from a technical point of view. 'On the weakness of technology, we have been re-jammed. It's not just a ZTE company's problem. It's national and national pain.' Shu Huaying stressed. (Reporter: Dang Bowen )
07 Wang Lei, Research Associate of the Intellectual Property Development Research Center of the State Intellectual Property Office, has a patience and perseverance strategy
Wang Lei, deputy researcher of the Intellectual Property Development Research Center of the State Intellectual Property Office, said that in 2017, China’s IC import volume was US$260.1 billion, which was close to double that of crude oil. In this context, component dependence is not only a problem that ZTE can solve. problem.
Wang Lei pointed out that the state attaches great importance to the development of state-owned self-developed chip technology. It is reported that at present, China has established large-scale chip R&D centers in Hefei and Wuhan, investing over 150 billion yuan. Although the current domestic chip design industry is still weak, but with China With the rise of the chip field, the long-term lack of 'core' problems in China's information and communication electronics industry is expected to be resolved. At the same time, Wang Lei also reminded that the chip strategy is by no means an effort. It requires long-term investment and must also have patience for the future. Perseverance, eager for quick success and instant benefit does not benefit the development of the chip industry. (Reporter: Tan Lun)
08 Li Di, vice president of CCID Consulting, should face progress rather than 'stick to death'
Vice President of CCID Consulting Li Lan believes that after the incident, there have been many criticisms of the Chinese semiconductor industry. However, in fact, China is now the world’s largest, fastest growing and most active semiconductor and integrated circuit market. China has become a An important part of the global semiconductor market, and the demand and share of the industry are still growing. We should face up to our own progress rather than 'stick to death'.
However, Li also pointed out that although the gap between China's semiconductor and even technology industries and developed countries still exists, it must be noted that to obtain industrial prosperity and progress depends not on 'locking up and shutting the country', but opening up, cooperation, and win-win situations. The ecological environment, as pointed out in the recent Boao Forum, opens up to prosperity and innovation leads the future.
Li Lan believes that after the ZTE incident, China’s science and technology industry should not stop the pace of opening up and innovation. Instead, it should further uphold the attitude of “opening the door to internal development and opening up to the outside world”, which is not only beneficial to the Chinese science and technology industry. Progress will also benefit the world. (Reporter: Tan Lun)
09 “Communications Industry News” (Web) Editor-in-Chief Xin Pengjun Global Cooperation is Industry Normality Technology Hegemony Impacts Industrial Ecology
Regarding the refusal of ZTE and reflections on some of the so-called 'coreless souls', the editor in chief of the Communications Industry News (Net) Xin Pengjun pointed out that in recent years, the Chinese communications industry has made considerable progress, regardless of industry scale or industrial ecology. The important forces of the global industry have led the world in some areas, and some areas of innovation have been at the forefront or even entered the no-man's land. It should be confident that the Chinese communications industry is not that unbearable. On the contrary, the Chinese communications industry has taken the lead in the world. Regardless of the formulation of industry standards, technological product development, application program capabilities, market influence and world rankings of leading companies, distribution of invisible champion industries, China's communications industry is an important force in the global industry.
However, at the same time, as in competition with industries and industries in various countries, there are also shortcomings in China's telecommunications, such as core core devices, high-end chip processors, and ecologically determined basic software, which are also subject to human beings and have reliance on international supply. The communications industry has been working on making up classes during the run. It has been working hard in the completely open Red Sea market, focusing on technology research and development and patent accumulation. In recent global ICT patent applications, Chinese telecommunications companies have taken the lead. At the same time as Chinese telecommunications companies are vigorously integrating innovations, they must continue to lay a solid foundation for R&D.
Xin Pengjun pointed out in particular that we should profoundly realize that the international cooperation of high-tech industries, such as information and communications, and the supply of industrial chains, are the normal conditions for industrial development. You have me, you have me, I have you, and you work in a high-tech ecosystem.砥砺 前行. Any company can't "conquer the world," and it is all working in the industrial chain. Each of the key technologies that can be successful, the core chip, and the underlying software are all caused by the opening of the industry chain. Key technologies, chips, and platforms are crucial. The politicization of technical issues is a typical hegemonism in technology. It is contrary to the 'contractual spirit' of technological openness. It is an impact on the benign industrial ecology. It embodies conservativeness and backwardness. Both from a technical and commercial point of view, it is not desirable. At the same time, the communications industry enterprise itself, in compliance with the premise, in the industrial chain cooperation policy, should also pay attention to multiple supply, to avoid 'exclusive reliance' or 'shop' Bully'. Globally optimizes technology supply and collaboration partners to predict industrial risks and support more benign ecosystems to avoid being led by the nose.
4. ZTE employees: Huawei designs only some of its chips. Whoever is sanctioned by the United States will die;
Sina Technology News April 23 afternoon news, Recently, a screen shot purporting to be the voice of ZTE internal employees circulated on the network, against the current variety of criticism, the employee said that the facts are not exactly the same as seen in the news, ZTE 2016 was The penalties actually violated the regulations. Since then, the compliance team headed by the president has been established. The company is completely transparent to the United States. All mail and servers are open. The FBI is based in the company. There are no obvious violations this time. They are all normal checks of the compliance process.
As for the media, ZTE Corporation has strengthened its compliance management, requiring each employee to re-learn the knowledge of European and American laws, regulations, and anti-bribery, and to participate in the compliance exam to achieve a score of 100 (out of full pass). It's a rumor that 'Never learnt European and American law, learning compliance, studying compliance exams, not just now, but regular actions starting from the year 16'. The employee asked questions at the same time - 'You imagine, a Chinese high The technology company was arbitrarily monitored by the FBI of the United States to check the data at any time.
'ZTE did not have any subjective desire to lie', the employee stressed in the article, 'One has been fully transparent. Second, the four highest levels. Including the president has dealt with, and what others can not handle. Third, Knowing that there is still a fine of 300 million U.S. dollars to follow, take this risk for several people.
In addition, the employee also stated that Huawei is only part of its own chip design, and very few. For 'ZTE do not put chips, so there is such a consequence' and other perspectives, the staff believes that the interlaced, the biggest problem in China is not With its own production process, even if the chip itself is designed and produced, it is also produced in the United States using technology. Even the software for designing the chip is the United States. 'Do not let you use, how do you simulate the algorithm? Therefore, any company is owned by the United States. The sanctions have died immediately. '
The following is the full text of screen shots by ZTE employees:
A ZTE employee's interpretation of the various criticisms on the current network is not exactly the same as what you saw in the news: 1. ZTE was fined 16 years in violation of the rules, so it paid a fine of nearly $900 million, but this time Actually there is no clear violation, it is the normal inspection of the compliance process. 2. Do not mix the 16-year penalty with this prohibition order. From 16 years later, ZTE has established the compliance headed by the president. The team, the company is completely transparent to the United States, all mails, all servers are open, fbi is resident in the company. And mail, information must be kept for more than 5 years, ready to be old and beautiful. 3. What you are talking about is rumors, never anything Studying European and American laws is learning compliance, studying compliance exams. It's not just beginning now, but also regular actions from the beginning of the year 16. I don't know where you hear the words from the European and American laws. After the 16th, ZTE spent more than 50 million. U.S. dollars, hire the most professional Compliance team in the United States, the team leader is the American. 4, on training, this is the regular training exam, what's the problem? I don't know what the focus of your discussion is. What? This training exam, we have been training regularly since we were punished in 16 years, this is in itself strengthening the compliance work. This is our sincerity in expressing our dedication to the US Department of Commerce in 16 years. That means we are really correcting the problem, you Think of all the emails and documents as transparent. In this case, there are other reasons to have the subjective intention to commit illegal behavior. 5. This is the clause we signed in order to reacquire the order after we have paid a fine in 16 years. You can no longer bow your knees. You imagine that a Chinese high-tech company is arbitrarily monitored by the US FBI, and you can check the data anytime. What can you do? Therefore, this punishment ZTE can not accept. 6, I found that the current article often takes 16 years. The matter is mixed with the current one. In 16 years, I said just now, I accepted the penalty, and now I say something 35 people in 18 years. First of all, this is not the content of the commitment clause. And the follow-up communication and consultation process is originally A process of normal negotiation. 7, similarly, the United States says that you want to punish these people, then the compliance team goes to check and finds that some people have penalties without issuing an announcement, so they wrote to the United States. It was a normal transaction, and the e-mail also informed that, yes, we have omissions, but now we have made up. 8. ZTE does not have any subjective desire to lie, one has been fully transparent. Second, the four highest Layer. Including the president has dealt with, and what others can't handle. Third, knowingly there are still 300 million U.S. dollars in fines waiting to be taken. For several people to take this risk. 9, The 35 people are not Written in the punishment agreement itself is a matter during the negotiation process. During the negotiation process, the United States suddenly announced the prohibition order, and there was no follow-up investigation and consultation. 10, Anyway, I am inside ZTE. From 16 Since the beginning of the year, I have always studied compliance and various requirements. You feel that ZTE is stupid and does not have a place. I don’t think there are several companies in the country that can match the current ZTE’s compliance team. This is a fine of 900 million U.S. dollars. Learning outcomes. The real company pays great attention to it and learns from time to time. I just said that I will study 11 every month after 16 years. Compliance exams Exam exams countless times, including management cadres, general staff , I didn't realize that this also became news. How could it be possible that the company spent 50 million US dollars on the investment? After paying a fine of 900 million U.S. dollars, who would dare to ignore such tuition? The head of the compliance team is the president of the company. We really corrected mistakes. , For the chairman of the board, the president, the new leader always takes compliance as the company's most important thing. 12. There is still an argument, saying that ZTE does not put chips, so there is such a consequence. Many similar to fpga, Dsp China does not exist, and the operating systems are all American and computers cannot be used. 13. Anyway, similarly wonderful views can be written in the news. They all look tired. 14. You may not yet understand the production process of the chips. China The biggest problem is that it does not have its own production process. The chip is designed and produced by the United States using its own technology. Even the software for designing the chip is the United States. For example, matlab simulation software, the United States, will not let you use it. How to simulate the algorithm? Therefore, any company that has been sanctioned by the United States immediately dies. 15, Huawei also designs only a part of its own chips, and it is very rare. Amplifiers, digital-to-analog conversion These chips are only available in the United States. Actually this prohibition order means that you cannot use any technology from the United States. Do not say anything else. With regard to Microsoft's operating system, Android's operating system will not allow you to use it. You cannot do anything. 16. Interlacing is like every other mountain. It is found that everyone's perceptions are indeed very different. No, but our company has employees on the plane, business trip support projects, after-sales engineers, our country's high technology is not simply a chip problem, and the entire industry chain Question. 17. Everyone thinks that there is no ZTE voice. It may have an emphasis on discipline in front of our company. It does not allow private comments on the incident. Now we can't stand it anymore. So it starts to go away. Like I said so much today. Yesterday, Before is not allowed. Sina Technology
5. Investors: Disputes between China and the United States, Chinese technology companies investing or turning to India;
According to the report of Wall Street Journal, according to Wall Street Journal, Baofan, chairman and chief executive of investment bank China Renaissance Partners, said that technology has become the early battlefield of Sino-US trade disputes and the global investment strategy of Chinese technology companies Major changes are likely to occur. Chinese companies will be more likely to invest in emerging markets such as India and Southeast Asia.
Bao Fan stated that in the current environment, he expects that investment in the United States will be reduced. He said: 'The reality is that the trade disputes between China and the U.S. are full of uncertainties and it is difficult to get things done.' Prior to this, the technology industry After a tumultuous week, we are closely watching the action taken by the U.S. and Chinese regulators on the biggest companies in this field.
The latest developments this week include: China’s regulators said that the US chipmaker Qualcomm will spend US$44 billion to acquire semiconductor company NXP Semiconductors for an antitrust investigation. A few days later, the US Department of Commerce announced the implementation of the China Telecom giant ZTE for 7 years. 2. The ban on sales, ZTE said that this move threatens its survival.
These moves pushed technology companies to the forefront of the growing trade dispute between China and the United States. The Trump administration has exerted pressure on the Chinese side to threaten to levy tariffs on China’s imports of US$150 billion worth of goods, while China also increases tariffs. Give back.
Charles Li, Chief Executive of Hong Kong Stock Exchange, said on Friday: 'I am very worried that this is unavoidable because it is a contest between a rising power and an old power. They have various frictions. , especially when their political and ideological systems are different.
As trade tensions escalated, some executives expressed concerns about the rise of economic nationalism, including Carlos Ghosn, chairman of the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Motors Alliance. Although Ghoen said he was worried, He also believes that this dispute will not become a comprehensive trade war. He said, 'I think the pressure for renegotiating the agreement is even greater'. After all, the United States thinks these agreements are not fair.
When talking about the renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement, Ghosn said that it is more important for car manufacturers to understand future trade rules than to understand the details of the rules. He said that car manufacturers will plan to build factories in the next 10 years. Or decide where to make cars, and must know how to formulate rules for meaningful planning.
One of the reasons for the increase in Sino-U.S. trade friction is that the United States accuses China of trying to steal American technology through unfair trade practices. Ralph Haupter, vice president of corporate affairs at Microsoft, said that Chinese companies are working with American technology. They have an advantage over Fujian, but they may face competition in multiple markets.
Hapte said: 'If you want to develop artificial intelligence technology, you need data, and China has huge amounts of data. If you need talent, China also has many talents. At the same time, all companies that are doing business in China are struggling because They either did not find a way to go abroad or they immediately went to the United States. 'Netease Technology