Lao Wei: China's biggest drawback in the development of integrated circuits: Expert responsibility system

Yesterday, Liang Ning wrote “A recount of the past about domestic chips and operating systems” in the circle of friends. He was a gentleman of the academician Ni Guangnan, but he also reflected the biggest drawback of China’s development of the IC industry: Expert responsibility system.

After nearly 20 years of acquaintance with Academician Ni, academician Ni’s honesty and admiration for his career admired. However, as a participant of Lenovo NC (Network Computer) that year, Fangzhou 1 was destined to be a failed case. I believe that he participated in the NC project that year. The industry is aware of this, but unfortunately, there are still many experts still advocating a general-purpose processor program that simply cannot create an industrial ecology.

From 909, 863 to the current major projects, the system of expert responsibility has always influenced the development of China's integrated circuit industry. Perhaps these experts are the most well-known professors in China's integrated circuit industry, but academics and industry have always been separated by yin and yang. In the big camp, professors can be consultants in the industry and can only be consultants.

The direct result of the expert responsibility system is technological determinism. Although technology plays a significant role in the process of industrial development, it is never a determinant of the final industry trend.

From Ark No. 1 to many cores such as Godson, Siucore, etc., the state has been supporting for nearly 20 years. The slogan is exactly the same as the previous year. The effect cannot be said to be no. Dream is still a dream.

ARM is now running mobile terminal processors, not Europe and the United States government's strong support, but that year Nokia in order to self-developed mobile phone chip selected from a variety of processor cores, if that year Nokia selected MIPS, SH4 or any other architecture, Perhaps ARM has long disappeared.

Choosing which kind of technical specifications is often the casual leader's accidental decision, or the balance between several overlords, it is difficult for the government or the academic community to influence the trend of industrial technology.

Even the WAPI and TD SCDMA, which the Chinese government strongly dominates and enjoys, are also the same.

China supports autonomous OS for more than 20 years. First, it wants to break the monopoly of Windows. Then it breaks the monopoly of Android. As everyone knows, Android is just a son bought by Google. It is not the monopoly of the United States that formed the present monopoly. Android can monopolize market operations completely. The product.

How hard is it to create an eco-friendly environment? As powerful as Intel spends billions of dollars to challenge the Android ecosystem, it's just as good as it gets.

The IEEE International Solid-State Circuit Summit held in the United States in February this year employed 202 papers. The Mainland, Hong Kong, and Macau have recruited the most 14 papers of the year, including 7 papers from the University of Macau and 2 from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 2 The first article from Fudan University, Peking University and Chengdu University of Electronic Technology was first accepted by ISSCC. This is the true level of the global chip Olympic Games in mainland China. It is still the best one.

Academically, it is not even comparable to Macau. Mainland China's experts control the dominance of massive funds and control the future planning and deployment of the mainland's IC industry.

Because experts are in charge, many industrial research funds in China are overly inclined toward universities and research institutes, and they are engaged in practical technology research that should have been led by companies. However, forward-looking technology research by China's IC companies is difficult to start because of financial difficulties.

Because the experts are in the spot, the mainland has emerged many entrepreneurial companies that rely exclusively on government funds for survival. Many of those companies that have performed well in the market have been kept out of the door because they are unwilling to barge experts;

Because the experts are in charge, many professors do not feel at ease doing academic work, but they want to become experts because once they become experts, they will become the object of envy and jealousy for everyone, and it will be even more glorious than academic success.

The system of expert responsibility has become the biggest drawback that restricts the development of China's integrated circuits. If the system does not change, it will seriously hinder the development of China's integrated circuit industry.

2016 GoodChinaBrand | ICP: 12011751 | China Exports