'Viewpoint': The United States banned ZTE chip, experts believe that opening the river is a disaster

1. Daddy: The United States banned ZTE chips, and the experts believed that opening the river is a disaster to the people; 2. Experts: China Semiconductor is not afraid of U.S. sanctions and is expected to enter the first echelon within 10 to 20 years; 3. China's core is not from the United States? Expert interpretation of ZTE Three major hotspots for sanctions; 4. How to crack the pain of 'core'? Focus on ZTE's three major hotspots; 5. U.S. sanctions after China's CPU self-controllable 'core three elements'

1. Daddy: The United States banned ZTE chips. Experts believe that opening the river is a disaster to the people;

The United States banned ZTE chips, and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology said that 'China's chip level has become closer to the world's top echelon', experts say 'China's high-end chip development has a basis'.

Even ZX's all chips that are subject to restrictions in the 12th and 13th Five Year National Research Programs have corresponding deployments.

Is this really true?

Indeed, China already has Hassin Kirin processors that rival Qualcomm processors. China's memory is also ready for trial production this year, but the fact that chips can be developed does not mean that catching up with the United States is close at hand.

Aside from the difference in the level of domestic chips and European and American (including Japan and South Korea) chips, the EDA tools used in domestic chips, most of IP cores come from Europe and the United States, wafer manufacturing, most of the equipment for packaging and testing come from Europe and the United States, sand is everywhere, and can be Most of the raw materials made from round steel are from Europe and the United States. The key is that most of the semiconductor patents in various fields are also controlled by Europe and the United States.

The modern semiconductor architecture has been established by Europe and the United States. The core technology of the entire industry chain has been basically controlled by European and American companies. Even if individual links in China break through, it is not enough to support the breakthrough of the Chinese chip industry.

The origin of Trump's 301 investigation was intellectual property rights. Independent innovation does not mean that people's intellectual property is not used.

The United States has banned the sale of chips to ZTE. China hopes to strengthen its independent innovation is not wrong, but if:

The US bans the sale of EDA tools and IP cores to China. How does China design chips?

The United States bans the sale of equipment to China, how does China build factories? There are only etchers that are not necessarily leading in their own right. How does a lithography fab not produce?

The United States prohibits the sale of products that use US technology or patents to China. Can China import any electronic components from overseas?

The answer is no. In the semiconductor field, if the United States completely prohibits the sale of technology or products to China, the Chinese semiconductor industry will completely collapse, and China’s powerful manufacturing industry will collapse across the board. This is not sensational.

The United States banned the sale of chips to ZTE, Broadcom in the United States, and Intel stopped supplying for the first time, while non-US companies were assessing the use of U.S. technology or patents, because even if they are powerful, such as Samsung, TSMC and other such integrated circuits are also emerging. It is impossible to use related patents or technologies of U.S. companies.

Independent innovation is not to set aside a new system for overseas technology. In this way, China's integrated circuits will regress for 20 years. Independent control is not a matter of isolating overseas companies. Such China's national security will be in jeopardy.

A few days ago I saw the newly released "Three core elements" of China's CPU self-controllability. I. Whether the CPU development unit meets the requirements for security and confidentiality; Second, whether the CPU instruction system can sustain independent development. Third, whether the CPU core source code is written by itself ;

It is not that there is no CPU that meets the 'core three elements' in China at present. Otherwise, these three elements cannot be released.

Whether the current computer processor or mobile phone processor has undergone system testing and security testing for decades, even then, whether Intel or Qualcomm has reported amazing security loopholes, the Chinese CPU can be controlled independently without mass data testing. , And how to ensure technically safe and controllable?

It is true that the CPU can be controlled independently. In the current state of China's industry, we must use foreign IP and EDA tools. Even if it is produced domestically, we must use overseas equipment, so that the loopholes produced are safe and controllable.

In many cases, the so-called self-control can only set the threshold to shut out the relevant stakeholders. The so-called independent innovation is only for obtaining more research funds from the country, either for name or profit.

The United States has conducted a 'double reverse' survey on China's photovoltaic industry, and it has not hindered the rapid development of China's photovoltaic industry. If the United States completely embargoes on China's semiconductor technology, China's decades of manufacturing power will be eliminated.

There is nothing wrong with making in China 2025. The premise is to participate in international cooperation, compete, respect intellectual property rights, and abide by international rules, not to fight against independent innovation that the United States has forced to shut down. It is impossible for China to set aside the existing semiconductor system. China Nor does the people allow retrogression of living standards for 20 years.

The keyboard party can open its mouth, and the result is only salutary. If the experts open their mouths, the result will be a misfortune for the country.

2. Experts: China Semiconductor is not afraid of US sanctions and is expected to enter the first tier within 10 to 20 years;

The U.S. sanctions ZTE Incident tells us: To change the current situation in which China's information industry is controlled by people, we must not only focus on improving the market share of products. We must 'construct a safe and controllable information technology system according to the requirements of General Secretary Xi Jinping.' (Loongson Zhongke Technology Co., Ltd. President Hu Weiwu)

Although the ZTE incident revealed that China has shortcomings in traditional chips, we have the conditions, ability, and methods to deal with the impact and interference in the development process of innovation. (China Electronics Information Industry Development Institute, Institute of Equipment Research Director Zuo Shi all)

According to the 12th Five-Year Plan of the '863' Plan, the government has focused on the deployment of optoelectronic devices in the fields of broadband communications, high-performance computers, backbone networks, optical switching, access networks, wireless communications, and microwave lightwave convergence. "A lot of these R&D projects are forward-looking. All chips that are subject to ZTE's restrictions have been deployed in the 12th and 13th national research plans. (Department of Semiconductors, National Institute of Semiconductors, Zhu Ninghua) )

We do have shortcomings in chip design, manufacturing, etc. In particular, the manufacturing process is relatively weak, and some of the core technologies and key equipment are not fully mastered. However, we all have layouts for these technologies, and the gap with foreign countries continues to narrow. (Chinese Academy of Sciences Microelectronics Institute Director Ye Tianchun

China has its own significant advantages. For example, it is vigorously implementing 'Made in China 2025' and has a huge market. China is developing at an extremely fast rate in the semiconductor and other fields. In the next 10 to 20 years, it will hopefully complement the short board and enter the first place. Echelon. (Prof. Zhang Ping, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications)

In recent years, China has continuously supported scientific and technological innovation in the field of optoelectronics. From the '863' program, the '973' program to the National Natural Science Foundation and other projects, a lot of money has been invested in guiding universities, research institutes and companies to optoelectronic chips and modules. The key technologies have carried out extensive and in-depth research and have achieved fruitful and innovative results. (Zhu Ninghua, Deputy Director, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences)

As long as the country selects 1-2 critical core optoelectronic chips that are urgently needed for the future information network, concentrate resources, and conduct comprehensive layouts from design, R&D, device preparation, and packaging testing, and through the guidance of the country, local and corporate participation, build a sound Optoelectronic chip processing platform, I believe that the short board for high-end chip R&D can be eased within 5 years (Zhu Ninghua, deputy director of the Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Since the 18th National Congress of the People's Republic of China, significant progress has been made in the R&D and industrialization of autonomous CPUs. First, the performance of autonomous CPUs has continuously improved, surpassing the low-end products of international mainstream CPUs, and it is approaching mid-to-high end. The second is the formation of thousands of companies based on autonomous CPUs. Enterprise's industrial chain, autonomous and controllable information industry system is forming. (Wu Weiwu, President of Godson Zhongke Technology Co., Ltd.)

Many domestic CPU companies rely on soft-core licenses obtained from third-party companies and even hard-core authorizations for '攒' CPUs. They do not really know how to write processor core code, and they cannot form their own core design capabilities. Therefore, CPUs Whether the nuclear source code is written by oneself is the key to determine whether a processor team has the ability to design CPU. (Wu Weiwu, president of Loongson Zhongke Technology Co., Ltd.)

In the high-end server CPU, we have planned to 2020. Shenwei 3232 is under development, mainly for the field of big data and cloud computing, at the same time, Shen Wei's ecological and industrial chain is also constantly improving. (National high-performance integration Deputy Director of Circuit (Shanghai) Design Center Tian Bin)

Only by insisting on independent research and development, establishing their own technical standards, and forming an independent industrial system is the fundamental way out for China's IT industry to get rid of the fate of people. (Wu Weiwu, President of Loongson Zhongke Technology Co., Ltd.)

Practice has proved that trade frictions and technical barriers can hardly hinder the development of a country's high-tech industry. In the 1970s, in the semiconductor industry, the United States and Japan erupted years of trade wars, but they did not hinder the rise of the Japanese semiconductor industry. In previous years, the United States and other countries implemented a 'double counter' survey on China's photovoltaic industry, which did not hinder the rapid development of China's photovoltaic industry. (Wang Changlin, executive deputy director of the Macroeconomic Research Institute of the National Development and Reform Commission)

As long as we adhere to the existing openness, competitive cooperation, and common development path, we will concentrate our government, R&D institutions, and the company's dominant strengths. We believe that it will not take too long to achieve the same level of success in the high-end of the industrial chain. Highlights of achievement. (Professor Li Hongbin, Peking University)

Note: This article is taken from major mainstream media reports.

3. China's core is not from the United States? Experts interpreted the three hot spots of ZTE being sanctioned;

Recently, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced that it has adopted export control measures for ZTE and the domestic industry is very concerned. Will this incident hinder the rapid development of China's high-tech industry? How do we respond to various shocks? The People's Daily reporter interviewed the industry and informatization Relevant person in charge and industry experts.

Export control will not hinder the rapid development of China's high-tech industry

Wang Changlin, executive deputy director of the Macroeconomic Research Institute of the National Development and Reform Commission, said that the US Department of Commerce announced that it will adopt export control measures for ZTE and will have a certain impact on the development of China's high-tech industry, but it will not hinder the rapid development of China's high-tech industry.

Wang Changlin believes that this is because China is playing an important role in the global high-tech industry chain. If the United States restricts its export of key technologies to China, it will undoubtedly affect China, and it will inevitably also hit the United States and Japan. Information industry. Moreover, we must also see that manufacturing industries in the United States and other developed countries are mainly supported by high-tech manufacturing industries. If the high-tech industry declines significantly, it will also affect US-related R&D services and other capital markets such as NASDAQ. , which has a major impact on the U.S. economy and the global economy.

China's high-tech industry has made important progress in innovation and has many advantages to speed up its development. Wang Changlin analyzed that China has formed an industrial system with complete system, complete facilities, and huge capacity, and has initially formed a number of innovative leading enterprises; After years of efforts, China currently has a number of technologies and products with independent intellectual property rights in the areas of chips, operating systems, etc., and it has achieved large-scale application in areas such as defense and military industry, and has a good foundation for accelerating the development of high-tech industries. The domestic market has huge scale and development potential. It can rely on large domestic demand to promote the development and industrialization of core technologies. This is not available in many other countries.

Wang Changlin said that practice has proved that trade frictions and technical barriers can hardly hinder the development of a country's high-tech industry. In the 1970s, in the semiconductor industry, the United States and Japan broke out a trade war for many years, but did not hinder the rise of the Japanese semiconductor industry. In another example, in previous years, countries such as the United States and the United States conducted a 'double reverse' survey on China's photovoltaic industry, which did not hinder the rapid development of China's photovoltaic industry. Moreover, from the perspective of aerospace, carbon fiber and other industries, the technological blockade of developed countries has accelerated The ability of independent innovation in these industries has improved.

China has the conditions, ability, and ways to deal with the impact of interference

Miao Wei, Minister of Industry and Information Technology, stated that at present, China has formed prominent advantages in improving infrastructure, enriching human capital, completing industrial systems, broad market space, and mobilizing the system efficiently. China's industrial technology level is increasingly close to the global frontier. , Overall in the middle of the technological catch-up, high-speed rail, UHV power transmission and transformation, communications equipment, network applications and other areas ranked among the world's advanced.

'Although the ZTE incident revealed that China has shortcomings in the traditional chip, but we have the conditions, ability, and have the means to deal with the impact and interference in the development process of innovation.' China Institute of Electronics Industry Development Equipment Research Institute, left Shi Quanquan said that China's technological innovation advantages are reflected in four aspects: Large-scale industrial advantages, The world's largest potential for manufacturing demand, Concentrating on the institutional advantages of major events and unparalleled advantages in human resources.

According to the person in charge of the Electronic Division of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, in recent years, the scale and quality of the chip design industry in China have been steadily improved, and major breakthroughs have been achieved in the subdivided areas. The domestic chips have significantly increased their ability to support key areas, and the construction speed of advanced technology production lines has been accelerating. Industry is close to the international advanced level.

Luo Wen, Deputy Minister of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology pointed out that at present, it is necessary to focus on the construction of a manufacturing innovation center, face the key common technologies of the industry, solve common problems such as special equipment, materials, and processes that are reflected in the industry, and leapfrog the scientific and technological achievements in engineering and industrialization. Valley of the valley '. Luo Wen said, take advantage of the situation, forward-looking deployment, strengthen strategic planning and overall coordination, promote the deep integration of the Internet, big data, artificial intelligence and manufacturing, promote the rapid and healthy development of advanced manufacturing, China will certainly be able to seize With a new round of opportunities in the history of science and technology and the industrial revolution, the road to innovation in China's manufacturing industry will also grow wider and wider.

China's high-end chip development has a basis

Zhang Ninghua, deputy head of the key expert group of the Optoelectronics and Microelectronics Devices and Integration of the 13th Five-Year National Research and Development Program, and the deputy director of the Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, said that China has continuously supported the scientific and technological innovation in the field of optoelectronics in recent years, and has achieved great innovation. Sexual results.

Zhu Ninghua introduced that only in view of the 12th Five-Year Plan of the '863' Plan, the state has conducted optoelectronic devices in the fields of broadband communications, high-performance computers, backbone networks, optical switching, access networks, wireless communications, and microwave lightwave convergence. Focused deployment. 'A lot of these R&D projects are forward-looking. ZTE's all chips that are subject to this restriction have corresponding deployments in the 12th and 13th national research plans.'

Zhu Ninghua analyzed that China currently has the basic conditions for the development of optoelectronic high-end chips. It is understood that in order to achieve independent innovation and development, China implemented a major national science and technology project “Very large scale integrated circuit manufacturing equipment and complete sets of processes” in 2008. During the year, we successfully created an innovation system for integrated circuit manufacturing in China. Before the special implementation, the most advanced mass production process for domestic integrated circuit manufacturing was 130 nanometers, and the R&D process was 90 nanometers. In the past 9 years, the mainstream process level in China has been improved by 5 generations. The 55, 40, and 28-nm three-generation complete sets of processes have been successfully developed and mass-produced. Breakthroughs have been made in the development of 22 and 14 nanometer lead technologies. Over 30 high-end equipment and targets such as 14-nanometer etchers and thin film depositions have been successfully developed, such as polishing fluids. Hundreds of material products, performance reached the international advanced level.

The 13th Five-Year National Key Development Program for Broadband Communication and New Network Key Expert Group members, Professor Li Hongbin of Peking University stated that China’s communications industry is undergoing a process of development from low-end to high-end. 'As long as we adhere to the existing open, competitive cooperation , The road to common development, the concentration of government, R&D institutions, and the strengths of the company's strengths, I believe it will not take too long. In the high-end of the industry chain - the core chip will also achieve the same world-renowned achievements.' Li Hongbin said. People's Daily

4. How to crack the pain of 'core'? Focus on the three major hot spots of ZTE's ban;

Original title: Strengthen 'Made in China' to crack 'Lack of Core' pain - Focus on ZTE's 'Redemption Order' Three hot spots

Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, April 20 (Reporter Jiang Lin, Yu Jiaxin, Liu Yangxuan) In response to the United States issuing an injunction against exports to ZTE, ZTE Corporation issued a statement on the 20th that the U.S. Department of Commerce did not complete the relevant investigation. 3. Firmly insisting on the most stringent sanctions against the company is extremely unfair to ZTE and ZTE cannot accept it.

Does the United States' ban on selling orders only address the 'non-compliance' operations of a single company? How big is the gap in the development of China's chip industry? How can we crack the pain of 'core' in the future? The reporter conducted multiple interviews for this purpose.

One question: 'The ban on sale' is only aimed at business 'non-compliance' operations?

On April 16, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security issued an activation call to ZTE and ZTE Communications on the ground that ZTE did not promptly deduct bonuses and issue disciplinary letters on some employees involved in historical export control violations. The company refused the decision.

Yin Yimin, chairman of ZTE Corporation, stated his position for the first time on the 20th: 'U.S. will expand the subtle issues indefinitely and cause great impact on the company. We will solve the problem through all legally permitted means.'

“This time the ban on selling orders” is part of the long business dispute between ZTE and the US. Enterprises should learn a lesson and they must abide by laws and regulations when they operate overseas. But we must also realize that ZTE is essentially a battle of science and technology. Be wary of the politicization of economic conflicts in the United States. ' Economist Zhang Lianqi thinks.

The U.S. side acts against China, but it will ultimately hurt the U.S. itself. It will not only lose tens of thousands of jobs, it will also affect hundreds of U.S. companies that have conducted extensive cooperation with ZTE Corporation and shake the international community. Confidence in the U.S. trade and investment environment. 'The spokesman of the Ministry of Commerce said at the peak.

"We hope that the US will properly handle the matter in accordance with regulations. The Ministry of Commerce will pay close attention to the progress of the situation and stand ready to take necessary measures to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies. ' Gao Feng said that if the United States persists in adopting the unilateralist protection policy, it will not hesitate to harm both China and the U.S. The interests of Chinese companies are trying to contain China's development and forcing China to make concessions. That is miscalculation.

Second question: Is there really such a big gap in the development of China's chip industry?

Industry insiders pointed out that ZTE's 'sales orders' disclosed the anxiety of the United States towards China's high-end manufacturing. On the other hand, it also warned us to face the gap between its own short-board and high-tech fields.

The chip is regarded as the 'engine' of the information age and is a comprehensive embodiment of a country's high-end manufacturing capabilities.

'The ZTE incident is not equivalent to the entire level of China's manufacturing industry, but it is not a case in China's manufacturing.' Zhang Lianqi said that China's 'core' dilemma represents a certain extent the status quo in China: It is big enough and not strong enough.

From big to strong, it is critical to see whether there has been import substitution in the high value-added stages of technology-intensive industries and industrial chains, whether it has reached the high end of the industrial chain, whether it has mastered key technologies and can iteratively innovate.

Ye Tianchun, director of the Institute of Microelectronics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, frankly stated: 'We do have shortcomings in chip design, manufacturing, etc., especially the manufacturing process is relatively weak. Some core technologies and key equipment are not fully mastered, but we have layouts for these technologies, and The gap with foreign countries continues to narrow. '

In recent years, a number of key equipments for integrated circuit manufacturing in China have achieved breakthroughs from scratch and the technological level has been fully upgraded. Taking ZTE Corporation as an example, its international patent applications rank among the top three companies in the world for eight consecutive years. A large number of self-developed special chips are used in the main products.

"Only if it is strong, will the other party treat you as an opponent. The 'sales order' reflects to a certain extent the United States' vigilance and concern for the development of China's high-end manufacturing industry.' Zhang Ping, a professor at Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications said.

Three questions: How will China crack the 'core' pain in the future?

In the future, can China crack the pain of 'core deficiencies'? Experts pointed out: We must not be arrogant or arrogant. We must firmly resolutely resolve our own development, maintain our strategic determination, and continue to innovate at the same time, increase open cooperation, and achieve more chips. The field is moving towards high-end industrial development.

In Ye Tianchun's view, the ZTE incident sounded a warning bell to China. Now that we must unify our thinking and discard the practice of 'buying better than buying', we can't make up for it, and we are determined to persevere in keeping our key technology equipment in our hands. Otherwise it will continue to be controlled by others.

'China has its own significant advantages. For example, it is vigorously implementing 'Made in China 2025' and has a huge market. China's rapid development in semiconductors and other fields will be expected to complement the short board into the next 10 to 20 years. An echelon. ' Zhang Ping is full of confidence.

Thanks to the institutional advantages, capital advantages, and market advantages of China's efforts to concentrate on major issues, some chip manufacturing and design companies are gradually turning to China. High-end talent in the semiconductor industry is also gathering in China.

"These are undoubtedly all accelerators for the development of the industry. ' A semiconductor industry veteran said with emotion that in the past, the display in the 'coreless screen' has undergone over 10 years of development and has completely depended on imports to become the largest in the world. Global technology evolution, the core problem can certainly be solved.

High-tech development requires more patience and confidence. With the rise of global trade protectionism, the road to jump is bound to be uneven.

Zhao Changwen, Minister of Industry and Economic Research at the Development Research Center of the State Council, said: 'No matter what disturbances are encountered, we must maintain our strategic determination to accelerate the implementation of 'Made in China 2025' in accordance with our pre-set goals and rhythm. As a persistent market Leading, open and inclusive strategic planning, also welcomes the participation of foreign companies, to achieve win-win cooperation. '

5. The U.S. Sanctioned ZTE Posts China's CPU Self-controllable 'Core Three Elements' Released

“The US sanctions on Chinese chips have strengthened our road to independent innovation. We need to step up the development of domestically-produced indigenous hardware and software bases. 'On April 19, at the Autonomous Safety Innovation Forum for Key Information Infrastructure held at Wanshou Hotel, Academician Ni Guangnan of the Chinese Academy of Engineering is not highly fluent in tone.

In addition, CTF Computer Security Director Yan Ming, Academician Shen Changxiang of the National Academy of Engineering, Tian Bin, Deputy Director of National High Performance Integrated Circuit (Shanghai) Design Center, and Wu Weiwu, President of Godson Zhongke Technology Co., Ltd. attended and conducted reports. The in-depth analysis and interpretation of the autonomously controllable standards of the processor and the formal release of the 'core three elements' of the CPU's autonomous control have established a judging standard for the prolific CPU market.

Developing an autonomous and controllable information infrastructure is imminent

Once upon a time, Google (1072.96, -14.74, -1.36%) withdrew from the Chinese market. At that time, I thought everyone was just like me. Everyone's search engine basically used Google, but we had Baidu (232.5, -4.61, -1.94). () %)) With the Gaode map, we also had the Beidou. Once upon a time, we even paid for hope to participate in international conferences, but we were still marginalized. In today’s forum, we also have to discuss this issue and Thinking. 'CTF Computer Security said for the director of the special committee.

On April 8, 2014, Microsoft (95, -1.11, -1.15%) formally stopped the service support for Windows XP and forced the trusted Windows8. At that time, if the domestic operation of 200 million terminals was upgraded to Windows8, not only cost a lot, but also lost security control and autonomy. '4 years later, in the key information infrastructure self-safety innovation forum, the two-faced Shen Changxiang recalled this history, in the same year in October, Microsoft introduced Windows10, announced the suspension of non-trusted windows7. On windows10, cloud computing, big data, servers, mobile terminals and other mandatory and hardware TPM chip configuration, pose a great threat to China's information security. 'We must seize the core of cyberspace security Technical strategic high ground. '

At the meeting, Tian Bin introduced the Shen Wei processor and industrial application. 'The current domestic CPU's phenomenon is weak performance, low level of product, low service level, and the development of the entire development partner market is costly.' Tian Bin said, 'With countries giving money, it's better to give a piece of the market, give it a piece of the world, and let the domestic CPU develop.' Shen Wei, the national team of domestic high-performance autonomous CPU R&D that was founded in Shanghai in 2003, has now established The autonomous “Shenwei 64′′ instruction system, independent control of software ecology, self-controllability of the whole process, research and development of supercomputer's CPU design, maintenance of the leading position in supercomputer CPU, support of HPC and artificial intelligence, deep learning and large Data fusion. 'On high-end server CPUs, we have planned to 2020.' Tian Bin said Shen Wei 3232 is under development, mainly for the field of big data and cloud computing, at the same time, Shen Wei's ecological and industrial chain It is also constantly improving. At the meeting, Tian Bin also demonstrated the computer used for his speech. 'This computer is made with Shen Wei's processor.'

CPU self-controllable 'core three elements' released

At the conference, Ni Guangnan released the contents of the “core three elements” of the CPU's self-controllable control. Whether it is truly autonomous and controllable mainly focuses on three points: First, whether the CPU development unit meets the requirements for security and confidentiality; and second, is the CPU instruction system sustainable and independent development, Third, whether the CPU core source code is written by itself. These three points are the core evaluation criteria of whether the CPU is autonomous and controllable. At the same time, if these three points are met, it means that it meets the requirements of the autonomous and controllable CPU, and cannot be satisfied at the same time. It means that it is not completely autonomous. Controllable or even completely involuntary controllable.

First, whether the CPU development unit meets security and confidentiality requirements

According to the relevant domestic accounting standards and relevant confidentiality qualification requirements, CPU companies are required to have no direct overseas investment, and the proportion of investment by foreign investors and their concerted parties who invest in indirect methods must not exceed 20% in the end. Applied to the core information equipment related to national economy and national defense security, it is of great significance to national security and economic development. Important enterprises that are related to national security must be firmly in their own hands and must not be controlled by foreign companies. Once the right of control has fallen into the hands of foreign investors, the basis for safety and autonomy will no longer exist. Therefore, compliance with national security and confidentiality regulations is the most basic requirement for the autonomous control of the CPU.

Second, whether the CPU instruction system can continue to develop independently.

The instruction system is an abstract model of the computer. It is the interface that the CPU presents to the upper software. It is the cornerstone of the independent development of the CPU. The self-developed instruction system must be designed autonomously or have long-term effective authorization of the existing international instruction system. And we can independently develop new directives so that we can not be controlled by others in the development of intellectual property and the future.

If authorized by the overseas enterprise instruction system, but the authorization is limited, after the expiry, the foreign company can terminate the authorization or skyrocketing the asking price, which will cause us to pay for the industry ecosystem based on the hard work of the system. If we cannot With the application of instructions to add instructions, you can only follow other people's technical routes step by step, it is difficult to build a secure and controllable information technology system. 'Wu Wei-wu interpretation.

Third, CPU nuclear source code is written

The CPU core source code here mainly refers to the processor's micro-architecture design, that is, the hardware source code of the processor core is to be independently written and designed, not to be derived from third-party authorization.

Why should the CPU core source code be written on its own and cannot be derived from third-party authorization?

Because the CPU is a huge complex system, mastering the core technology of CPU design is not a matter of overnight. Foreign third parties are also not able to inform their domestic companies about their core design technologies. Therefore, the 'innovation and re-innovation' model is not so effective in the CPU design industry. Applicable. For this, Hu Weiwu said that the recent discovery of the “fuse” and “ghost” hidden dangers in the Intel CPU has given the industry an inspiration, even if the designer is not fully aware of the security risks caused by the complexity of the CPU, let alone Look at the design of others. Many domestic CPU companies rely on soft-core licenses obtained from third-party companies and even hard-core licenses for '攒' CPUs. They do not really know how to write processor core code, and they cannot form their own core. Design capabilities. Therefore, whether the CPU core source code is written is a key to determining whether a processor team has the ability to design CPUs.

The release of the 'core three elements' has made it possible for CPUs to be autonomous and controllable. This, of course, is not the evaluation of all dimensions of the autonomous control of the CPU. In terms of autonomous and controllable levels, such as whether it is produced in the territory, the Whether the hardware and software are autonomous or controllable can be used to further distinguish the autonomous and controllable level of the CPU. However, this is based on meeting the three core elements of the CPU's autonomous controllability.

Source: Economic Observer Online reporter Chen Yifan

2016 GoodChinaBrand | ICP: 12011751 | China Exports