Sina Technology News April 17 afternoon news, for expulsion due to Tucao senior vice president Yang Hao, Meizu former director of creative Zhang Jia (Microblog name: Gavin Zhang) issued a statement that does not accept the company's mail His own evaluation, and will take legal measures to protect his own interests. He also said that Yang Hao is not only a problem of ability and attitude, but also the abuse of power, the use of designated suppliers and the existence of tax evasion problems.
Zhang Jia had previously shelled Yang Lan on Weibo. He thought that he was unable to take Meizu out of trouble. Although he soon deleted the blog and apologized, Meizu released an internal e-mail today saying that Zhang Jia’s move had a serious impact on the company’s reputation. Decided to give Zhang Jia a dismissal, dismissed Zhang Jia’s labor contractual relationship and pursued his legal responsibility according to law.
Zhang Jiagang also just issued a statement in Weibo saying that he did not use abusive language, did not spread rumors, did not accept comments on himself in company e-mails, and would take legal measures to safeguard his rights.
The following is the full text of Zhang Jia’s statement:
All of you, I'm Zhang Jia. Explain that all my remarks are directed at alpacas and their teams. They have nothing to do with the company.
Looking at my Weibo, you can see that I did not use abusive language, did not spread rumors, I do not accept the evaluation of the company e-mail, and will take legal measures to safeguard their rights and interests.
I really do not agree with the alpacas and their team, but also determined that he can not lead us out of the predicament, can not push the Meizu brand to the so-called high-end positioning.
If a senior executive only has problems in his abilities and attitudes, his injury to the organization is still limited. However, there are problems in terms of power and costs. I am afraid it is not so simple.
Yes, maybe you don’t care. After all, this money does not come from your pocket. However, it abuses power and uses its designated suppliers (there is tax evasion and tax evasion). The cost of video and video production is inflated and the adoption of new products is very limited. The promotion method will only lead to: The money is wasted, the effect is limited, and they have hurt their pockets and hurt the company.
The most terrible thing is, who else is willing to do it for the sake of cost-saving? Who will seriously compare suppliers, and who can guarantee that they will not be careful?
Bad coins expel good money.
I can leave, but justice may have to be maintained by myself.
There are countless people who have persuaded me that you are only 34 years old, and there are more than 50 people. You are still young. There are plenty of time and space... I think, maybe I will sooner or later become a so-called 'pragmatic' middle age. Man, but can I push this time point backwards as far as I can?
Remember the Swedish movie? En man som heter Ove
My short comment on the watercress is: The straight boy will not grow old, they will only be proud to die. And before the deathbed, but also to specify the funeral and to attend the guests - do not agree with I do not come!
Maybe I'll change, Maybe I won't manage it, At least, At the moment, I'm going to tell the world, I don't believe it.
Please refer to the following two project forms (internal disclosure), pay attention to the use of 15 marketing costs, and evaluate the value of these tasks for new product distribution. To defend the company's interests is to defend your own interests.
Not far from rivers and lakes, goodbye.
Zhang Jia
April 17, 2018