According to public information, Yushi Technology was formerly known as the storage and multimedia division of Hangzhou Huasan Communication Company. In 2011, the overall division of Huasan Communications Storage & Multimedia Division was independently operated, and Zhejiang Yushi Technology Co., Ltd. was established. Video surveillance product development, production and sales.
Huasan designed and started using the imos inside trademark in 2006. It has been used for 12 years.
In April 2011, Huasan applied for the registration of imos inside trademark to the Trademark Office. In May 2013, the Trademark Office approved the registration. However, Intel opposed its registration and filed trademark opposition and invalidation applications in order until 2015. program.
In 2015, Intel once again raised an objection to the trademark imos inside, and believe that the trademark is similar to that of intel inside, and that the application for registered trademark should not be approved. The Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (hereinafter referred to as the “Trademark Office”) is authorized The management department, Intel submitted invalid objections to the State Administration for Industry and Commerce's Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (the State Trade Review and Adjudication Board, the higher level review office of the Trademark Office). It was unsuccessful. Recently, Intel sued the National Trademark Review and Adjudication Committee in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court. Three people.
In this regard, Yu Ruian, Minister of Legal Affairs of Yushu, and Dean of the Institute of Astronautics, Xie Huibin, 'Father of IMOS', said that Yushi came from China, that is, Huawei 3Com. Hua San as Huawei and 3Com. As a Sino-U.S. joint venture company, it entered the European and American markets. 3Com had made a key testimony that Cisco did not copy Cisco in Cisco’s v. Huawei intellectual property case. Therefore, Yushu’s team is at least a game of rules for patents, standards, and trademarks. , There is enough psychological preparation.
After the company has a certain reputation and market share, such disputes will appear. Take the patent as an example. The industry is familiar with:
1) Acquisition of professional technology companies, such as Interdigital, Objectvideo, professional acquisition of core patent + lawyers, legal fees to collect the costs of industrial production companies. These companies are not large, the main composition of revenue almost from the patent tax.
2) Large-scale enterprise alliances, collective fees, such as the H.265 Alliance. At an active level, the unified mode increases the efficiency of charges, which can be regarded as legal companies providing channels for payment and cooperation, and exploring and identifying potential charging targets. On the negative side, there is everything. On the other side of dialectics, in the context of deindustrialization in the West, the share of products has been eroded by Chinese companies, so the proportion of patent fees has accounted for the increase in revenues of Western companies. Typical, such as the Nortel Networks bankruptcy, professional rights have not been sold, are professional The company is operating.
3) Giants such as Qualcomm or Intel, 'high tax' or 'trademark rights'.
In addition, Yushi does not exaggerate the importance of imos inside the trademark, but as a Chinese innovation that is completely original from the code to the brand image, if it can not continue to use it, at least it is a dampening on the enthusiasm of the enterprise, and it is also a disrespect for independent innovation in China. imos Inside is the composition of the invisible assets of Yushi brand.