In this smoke-filled March, the mobile phone industry once again ushered in a new round of outbreaks. However, compared with the flagship flying situation in the same period of last year, this year, the major manufacturers did not use the flagship as the main push product for this month, but instead released it. A variety of products are available for the 1,000-yuan price segment. This shows that the major manufacturers pay much attention to the 1,000-yuan price segment. In these products, they honor the 7C, red rice note 5, and Charm Blue E3. The product is the most attention. To this end, the author specifically to get these three products, in the next time for everyone to carry out a detailed interpretation.
At the conference of the three products, Glory, Red Rice, and Charm Blue all inspected the camera in a large space. From our guesses, the three of them would have taken great efforts to photograph this one. For this reason, this time we took out these three machines to conduct a comprehensive photo comparison and see if their actual performance was as stated in the press conference.
▲At the conference, Glory / Red Rice / Charm Blue inevitably provided a large-scale explanation Compared to previous products of the same level, the glory 7C, the red rice note5, and the Charm Blue E3 are all equipped with dual cameras. This reflects that the dual camera has become the focus of attention of the user. Then the problem comes, in the double blessing After the photo is taken, will the camera effect of the thousand-yuan machine be improved? What are the three products worthy of attention in terms of photographing? Let's explore it together.
▲ Glory 7C / Red Rice note5 / Charm Blue E3 camera parameters From the parameter point of view, all three mobile phones use the depth of field solution. Among them, the main camera with the 7C glory is the highest, but the parameters of the sub-lens are the lowest. I don't know if it will affect the performance of the blur. Red rice note5 Although the main camera of Charm Blue E3 could not find any specific information, I guess they may be from the same solution. With the front camera, the Charm Blue E3 disdains 20 million pixels, while the glory 7C has only 8 million pixels.
Glory 7C / Red Rice note5 / Charm Blue E3 Photo Contrast: Camera Experience
For the user, whether the camera interface is easy to use, whether the camera function is comprehensive, whether the live view is smooth, and whether the focus is accurate and fast are the focus of attention of the users. Therefore, the author specifically carries out the relevant experience, as follows:
▲Glory Play 7C Interface
▲ red rice note5 interface
▲ Charm Blue E3 interface In terms of interface design, the design styles of the three products are relatively simple. At the same time, for the convenience of users, some commonly used functions, including camera shooting, can be directly selected by left/right sliding. In terms of functional diversity, three In addition to providing the most basic functions, it also provides users with some fresh and useful features, such as professional models, panoramic cameras, etc.
On the whole, in the aspect of interface design and functional diversity, the performance of the three is relatively mature and there is not much difference.
Viewfinder experience:
▲Viewfinder experience
In terms of focusing speed and live view, Redmi Note5 and Charm Blue E3 are both very good in performance, focusing quickly and accurately. In this session, Honor played 7C, the focus failed, in addition, The speed of focusing is also worse than that of the other two mobile phones. The author believes that the reason for the glory of playing the 7C appears to be the problem of processor performance. After all, the other two mobile phones are equipped with Nine Dragon 6 series CPUs. , Glory Chang Chang 7C is equipped with Nine Dragons 4 series CPU, there is still a certain gap in the actual performance.
In general, in the photo experience session, apart from the fact that the glory 7C has a disadvantage in focusing accuracy and speed compared to the other two, the gap between the interface design and the camera function is very small. It can be said that With the maturity of various systems, the gap between the camera interface and the camera function has been negligible.
Glory 7C/Red Rice note5/ Charm Blue E3 Photo Contrast: Basic Picture Quality
What we bring here is the real proofs of the three products. First of all, let's look at the performance of the three products in a well-lit environment.
▲Glory plays 7C proofs
▲ millet note5 proofs
▲ Charm Blue E3 proofs
▲ Detail Comparison (from left to right: Glory 7C/Red Rice note5/ Charm Blue E3) In the first set of proofs, we can see that the three products' styles of color and light control are all slightly different. Among them, the glory of the Play 7C is slightly conservative, and the Charm Blue E3 is somewhat overexposed. Feeling. In terms of color, the color of Glory 7C and red rice note5 is more true, the color of Charm Blue E3 feels a little lighter. In terms of details, red rice note5 performed best, followed by Charm Blue E3.
▲ Sample display (from left to right: Glory 7C/Red Rice note5/ Charm Blue E3)
▲ Detail Comparison (from left to right: Glory 7C/Red Rice note5/ Charm Blue E3) In the second set of proofs, the picture of Glory playing 7C is somewhat reddish, the color of Charm Blue E3 is still a bit pale, and the best overall performance is still red rice note 5. In terms of picture details, three mobile phones did not display Too much difference.
▲Glory plays 7C proofs
▲ millet note5 proofs
▲ Charm Blue E3 proofs
▲ Detail Comparison (from left to right: Glory 7C/Red Rice note5/ Charm Blue E3) The last set of proofs tested the color reproduction capabilities of the three products. In this group of proofs, the most Close to the true color is the glory play 7C, followed by the charm blue E3. And the color of the red rice note5 looks a little bleak. The local details, the charm blue E3 and the red rice note5 basically the same, but the glory play 7C is Apply more serious.
In general, although Glory Play 7C has 1 million more pixels than the other two products, the actual imaging and picture details However, it did not manifest itself. Instead, there was a phenomenon of reddishness and smearing of details. On the other hand, red rice note5 performed better in this round. Whether it is the overall picture brightness or the details are all excellent.
Glory 7C/Red Rice note5/ Charm Blue E3 Photo Contrast: Low Light Night Shot
For many users, imaging in the night/low light state is also very important, so in this session, the author will show you the imaging performance of these three products at night/low light conditions.
▲Glory plays 7C proofs
▲ millet note5 proofs
▲ Charm Blue E3 proofs
▲ Detail Comparison (from left to right: Glory 7C/Red Rice note5/ Charm Blue E3) In the first set of proofs, the performance of Glory Play 7C in the night was somewhat unsatisfactory, especially the control of the highlights. The best thing to do was Charm Blue E3. The whole picture was pure and the highlights were not overexposed. In terms of details, the best thing to do is the red rice note5. The text above the stop sign can be clearly displayed.
▲Glory plays 7C proofs
▲ millet note5 proofs
▲ Charm Blue E3 proofs
▲ Detail Comparison (from left to right: Glory 7C/Red Rice note5/ Charm Blue E3) The proofs in the room can also reflect the overall performance under low light conditions. It can be seen that although the overall picture performance of the three products is quite good in the proofs of this group, the red rice note5 can be said to be unique in terms of resolving power. , not only defeated the same pixel level charm blue E3, and even beat the glory of the higher pixel value playing 7C, is commendable.
▲Glory plays 7C proofs
▲ millet note5 proofs
▲ Charm Blue E3 proofs
▲ Detail Comparison (from left to right: Glory 7C/Red Rice note5/ Charm Blue E3) This last set of proofs can also reflect the advantages of red rice note5 in terms of detailed analysis. The glory of the Chang 7C in the night and the more complex lighting conditions, the actual imaging performance will appear larger problems, especially in many In the case of 1 million pixels, the resolution of the screen is the worst among the three mobile phones, which directly breaks the author's intrinsic impression of the glory of the mobile phone.
In general, in the night/low light environment, Charm Blue E3 does the best for the control of light, but it still needs to be strengthened in terms of resolving power. While the red rice note5 has appeared a little in the complex light scene. Exposure, but its excellent performance of the details of the picture to add a lot of points. In this section, the worst performance turned out to be 7C glory play, in a hard condition than the opponent 1 million pixels, glory play The 7C's resolving power is the worst of the three. This is indeed unacceptable.
Glory 7C / red rice note5 / Charm Blue E3 photo comparison: dual photo proofs
Finally, as dual-camera products, their dual-camera performance is also worth looking forward to. From their proofs, we can also see the overall performance of the thousands of machines currently equipped with dual cameras in terms of blur, so the author will It will be divided into three levels to show the overall strength of their dual shots.
▲Glory plays 7C proofs
▲ millet note5 proofs
▲ Charm Blue E3 proofs
▲ Detail Comparison (from left to right: Glory 7C/Red Rice note5/ Charm Blue E3) In Level 1, we mainly test their depth of field recognition. Overall, Charm Blue E3 and Redmi Note5 can accurately identify different depths of field to make corresponding blur, while Glory Play 7C. Obviously blurred, but from the edge of the details, it is actually a bit over the depth of field recognition.
▲Glory plays 7C proofs
▲ millet note5 proofs
▲ Charm Blue E3 proofs
▲ Detail Comparison (from left to right: Glory 7C/Red Rice note5/ Charm Blue E3) In Level 2, we can see that Glory Chang 7C is still very aggressive in terms of blur, but its forecast for depth of field needs to be strengthened. And Charm Blue E3 and red rice note5 also began to make some prediction errors.
▲Glory plays 7C proofs
▲ millet note5 proofs
▲ Charm Blue E3 proofs
▲ Detail Comparison (from left to right: Glory 7C/Red Rice note5/ Charm Blue E3) In the most difficult Level 3, despite the fact that people have experienced various degrees of mistakes in terms of depth of field, the overall performance of the 7C is better than that of the other two. However, the worst effect in identifying this group of proofs is Charm Blue E3, actually put the feathers on the front to give up, this mistake is still quite serious.
In this session, the performance of the three mobile phones is not really good, although they have performed quite well compared to the previous generation of dual camera products. But it is undeniable that in terms of depth of field prediction and the strength of blur, three The product still needs to be strengthened.
Glory 7C / red rice note5 / Charm Blue E3 photo comparison: Full text summary
At the end of the article, the author once again sums up the performance of these three products in photographing:
1, in terms of experience, all three have a wealth of camera features to choose from, but in terms of focus speed, the glory of playing 7C still needs to be strengthened;
2. In the basic quality aspect, the best performance is red rice note5, especially the resolution in details is impressive;
3, in the night shot / low light, red rice note5 detail resolution is still awesome, but for the control of light Charm Blue E3Best performance
4, In terms of dual camera blur, the performance of the three players is quite satisfactory
▲Glory 7C/red rice note5/charm blue E3 photo comparison See here, I believe that the hearts of the young partners have an impression on the actual performance of these three products in the photographing. Say, after comparison, the author still has a big feeling, after all, these three products compared In the early days, thousands of machines had already had a difference in the camera aspect. In some respects, their performance could even compete with the current flagship. Of course, for the users, this improvement is definitely It is profitable without harm.