As an important part of our life nowadays, the mobile phone users are getting more and more privacy, from simple browsing habits to our bank cards and various payment information, and even some of the students who can not be outsiders Know that little secret.That in order to protect them, naturally, we need the hands of the phone can pay enough attention to them, just take the hands of several existing machines, take a look at the various manufacturers in the privacy protection to do Out of effort. First introduce mobile phones, respectively, the works of red and blue manufacturers, vivo X20 Plus UD and R11s, plus just before the evaluation of the remaining Meizu PRO 7, and Xiaobian own main machine millet 6. Speaking of privacy encryption, Of course, every family is afraid to not do big functions, but doing carefully or not, we must look at the details of the experience brought about, and today we follow the normal encryption of an application process to see if manufacturers are on the heart. Application encryption should be considered the most basic privacy protection requirements, do not want people to look at the application, it is simple and direct lock, is a simple yet solid and effective way to protect privacy. We start directly, take a look at each application encryption interface.  Millet 6: Settings - Application Lock X20: Settings - Fingerprint, Face and Password - Privacy and Application Encryption  PRO 7: Settings - Fingerprinting and Security - Apply Encryption  R11s: Settings - Security - Apply Encryption These are four mobile phones, or four systems application encryption interface.In addition to millet, the remaining three systems are applied encryption on the third level menu, basically classified as security under the two options Part of the students may feel more convenient to put the second menu, there are also some students will feel that the application of encryption is not a high frequency of use features can be accommodated to make the settings page more concise, because here four systems can be Direct search for relevant keywords into the function, placement has become a matter of opinion, let's not judge. Back to the function itself, we can see that we can encrypt the application are more comprehensive, the basic cover from the system application to third-party applications, all of the content here OV criticize the two because they have encrypted and unencrypted applications Are mixed together, this is not conducive to management. Like millet and Meizu, has been encrypted applications will be proposed in the forefront of the separate arrangement, the two plates are distinct. At the same time also highlight the millet classmates, because only MIUI in the encryption interface The search options, we can see that, while the remaining few phones are not many applications, even without using search can quickly find the need to encrypt the application, but as the main machine can choose to use a total of more than 140 If you do not have the option to search, you can easily go wrong by simply looking up and down. This detail is still very good.  Encryption is done after trying to enter the application of encryption, and in the verification phase, several mobile phones also perform differently. Which OPPO R11s encryption most, you can use face recognition, fingerprint identification and password to verify three ways , Followed by millet 6 and vivo X20 that can use the fingerprint + password dual recognition, the weakest is the Meizu PRO 7 can only use a password to unlock a way.Less facial recognition This security has some flaws in the verification is understandable, but less Fingerprint verification is really a bit inconvenient. In addition there is a certain difference between the four verification strategies, millet 6, X20 and PRO 7 are verified, as long as no lock screen, the second entry does not require re-verification, and R11s Is no matter the lock is not locked screen, jump out again after entering are to repeat the verification As for this is more secure or more troublesome, we are not too much evaluation. Incidentally, just like the above screenshots, Pro 7, R11s and X20 are all screenshots, and you can also see the verification methods of each of them (in order to facilitate the screenshots, R11s is not turned on Facial recognition verification), while millet is more cautious, any need to enter the password of the interface, the system is prohibited screenshots, where you can only put a photo for everyone to take a look. In this regard, the feeling of millet privacy protection is still on the heart of these details are more done place that encryption and validation in accordance with the normal sequence have been understood, and then we have a try Whether or not to use some side-by-side ways to spy on privacy is better than unlocking into a multitasking page to see if you can see some of the information in the preview of the task list. From the screenshot we can see that our attempt is completely failed, four mobile phones into the multi-task list, will be encrypted content privacy application block, in which the millet 6 method is relatively simple and crude, showing only one on Application lock white tips, the remaining three are different degrees of use of the magic of this blur, which in turn the best fuzzy effect of X20, is a kind of frosted glass as a general both aesthetic and privacy protection approach. Here only to the application of encryption, for example, the actual number of these phones can also be a separate file on a separate encryption, but its encryption process and the use of experience and application encryption are similar, here we will cite this example. In fact, through a simple comparison can be found, no matter which one of the four mobile phones in the encryption are very good privacy protection, the basic functions are not missing, more is the difference in experience and details, as these differences cause everyone The different preferences, Xiaobian think this is an interesting place, if all the same, not on the contrary become not fun it.
As an important part of our life nowadays, the mobile phone users are getting more and more privacy, from simple browsing habits to our bank cards and various payment information, and even some of the students who can not be outsiders Know that little secret.That in order to protect them, naturally, we need the hands of the phone can pay enough attention to them, just take the hands of several existing machines, take a look at the various manufacturers in the privacy protection to do Out of effort. First introduce mobile phones, respectively, the works of red and blue manufacturers, vivo X20 Plus UD and R11s, plus just before the evaluation of the remaining Meizu PRO 7, and Xiaobian own main machine millet 6. Speaking of privacy encryption, Of course, every family is afraid to not do big functions, but doing carefully or not, we must look at the details of the experience brought about, and today we follow the normal encryption of an application process to see if manufacturers are on the heart. Application encryption should be considered the most basic privacy protection requirements, do not want people to look at the application, it is simple and direct lock, is a simple yet solid and effective way to protect privacy. We start directly, take a look at each application encryption interface. Millet 6: Settings - Application Lock X20: Settings - Fingerprint, Face and Password - Privacy and Application Encryption PRO 7: Settings - Fingerprinting and Security - Apply Encryption R11s: Settings - Security - Apply Encryption These are four mobile phones, or four systems application encryption interface.In addition to millet, the remaining three systems are applied encryption on the third level menu, basically classified as security under the two options Part of the students may feel more convenient to put the second menu, there are also some students will feel that the application of encryption is not a high frequency of use features can be accommodated to make the settings page more concise, because here four systems can be Direct search for relevant keywords into the function, placement has become a matter of opinion, let's not judge. Back to the function itself, we can see that we can encrypt the application are more comprehensive, the basic cover from the system application to third-party applications, all of the content here OV criticize the two because they have encrypted and unencrypted applications Are mixed together, this is not conducive to management. Like millet and Meizu, has been encrypted applications will be proposed in the forefront of the separate arrangement, the two plates are distinct. At the same time also highlight the millet classmates, because only MIUI in the encryption interface The search options, we can see that, while the remaining few phones are not many applications, even without using search can quickly find the need to encrypt the application, but as the main machine can choose to use a total of more than 140 If you do not have the option to search, you can easily go wrong by simply looking up and down. This detail is still very good. Encryption is done after trying to enter the application of encryption, and in the verification phase, several mobile phones also perform differently. Which OPPO R11s encryption most, you can use face recognition, fingerprint identification and password to verify three ways , Followed by millet 6 and vivo X20 that can use the fingerprint + password dual recognition, the weakest is the Meizu PRO 7 can only use a password to unlock a way.Less facial recognition This security has some flaws in the verification is understandable, but less Fingerprint verification is really a bit inconvenient. In addition there is a certain difference between the four verification strategies, millet 6, X20 and PRO 7 are verified, as long as no lock screen, the second entry does not require re-verification, and R11s Is no matter the lock is not locked screen, jump out again after entering are to repeat the verification As for this is more secure or more troublesome, we are not too much evaluation. Incidentally, just like the above screenshots, Pro 7, R11s and X20 are all screenshots, and you can also see the verification methods of each of them (in order to facilitate the screenshots, R11s is not turned on Facial recognition verification), while millet is more cautious, any need to enter the password of the interface, the system is prohibited screenshots, where you can only put a photo for everyone to take a look. In this regard, the feeling of millet privacy protection is still on the heart of these details are more done place that encryption and validation in accordance with the normal sequence have been understood, and then we have a try Whether or not to use some side-by-side ways to spy on privacy is better than unlocking into a multitasking page to see if you can see some of the information in the preview of the task list. From the screenshot we can see that our attempt is completely failed, four mobile phones into the multi-task list, will be encrypted content privacy application block, in which the millet 6 method is relatively simple and crude, showing only one on Application lock white tips, the remaining three are different degrees of use of the magic of this blur, which in turn the best fuzzy effect of X20, is a kind of frosted glass as a general both aesthetic and privacy protection approach. Here only to the application of encryption, for example, the actual number of these phones can also be a separate file on a separate encryption, but the encryption process and the use of experience and application encryption are similar, here we will cite this example. In fact, through a simple comparison can be found, no matter which one of the four mobile phones in the encryption are very good privacy protection, the basic functions are not missing, more is the difference in experience and details, as these differences cause everyone The different preferences, Xiaobian think this is an interesting place, if all the same, not on the contrary become not fun it.
|
