This will not only create a whole new business, but will also allow advertisers to find you in a more targeted way (they not only know where you are, but also know if your garden needs to be watered or if the milk in your refrigerator is almost finished The economic benefits are enormous, and while the large tech companies are rich, the new 5G world will create several exponentially more fortunes, but the technologies that underpin it all are being threatened by a quarrel 20180211-5G-patent Traditionally, companies such as Apple, Google, Samsung, and other companies that make wireless devices are key Wireless technology developers, including Qualcomm, Nokia and Ericsson, pay royalties to use their chips and other key patent intellectual property (IP) standards in the U.S. and Europe. What technologies are crucial to building a foundation system and then allow innovators to patent the technology for such technologies - as long as they are available to all market participants 'Fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory' authorized use.
Of course, there is a huge disagreement between parties about what counts as fair, especially as more types of devices are interconnected.
One of the most controversial issues is whether the price of the key patented technology should be based on chip prices (which may cost only a few dollars) or chip-driven phones (which may cost hundreds of dollars). Technology giants, of course, want the patent license value On the chip, that would mean they pay a lower fee for intellectual property.
Companies such as Qualcomm hope the price is based on finished product prices, such as a cell phone or even a car, arguing that connectivity needs vary widely for a device, such as a device that monitors soil moisture once a week A car that stays connected at all times and the price should reflect such specific conditions.
These issues are part of a deeper and growing disagreement: on the one hand, the major consumer brands such as Apple, who consider themselves the most capable of integrating tens of thousands of patented technologies into a beautifully crafted product Value contributors; on the other hand, the United States and Europe innovators, who argued that they invested heavily in research and development to create standards and technologies that make smartphones smart and smart, and the result was cheaper.
As a result, according to a recent survey, about three-quarters of wireless technology intellectual property holders refuse to make sure that they will authorize the use of their latest technology, which may begin to undermine connectivity.And Apple and Qualcomm endless The legal battle reflects this confrontation, and Qualcomm is declining to ship its chips to Apple, which refuses to pay Qualcomm for the products it is already using.
Both sides have reasons. Critics say Qualcomm is overpowered on its technology claims, but it's also wrong for Apple to refuse royalties: Managing Director Houlihan Lokey, a San Francisco-based investment bank, Elvir Causevic said: "There are so many lawsuits now that the regulatory agencies in the United States or the EU have not done their job well." Indeed, the regulatory signals issued by the United States and Europe contradict each other.
In 2015, the standard setting body in the United States, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), took a stand by supporting large technology companies, but on November 10 this year, Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim of the United States Department of Justice, ) Said in a speech that he believes the problem is more serious for those who refuse to pay royalties (such as Apple) than patent owners who claim higher fees and 'blackmail' the entire system.
In the meantime, the European Commission is heading in the opposite direction, and you might think Europe will certainly want to protect its telecom companies, but there are disagreements within the council, one for innovative supporters of telecoms companies such as Nokia and others The research carried out by the company provides funding; the other is an antitrust officer who treats the patent as a monopoly that should not be protected.
In addition, antitrust officials may be interested in protecting a diverse set of stakeholders, and if the car really turns into a smart phone on wheels, French, German and Italian carmakers will need to get cheap wireless technology, like Apple Like Google, the European Commission may abandon telecoms (and the existing patent system) and give European carmakers a comparative advantage in smart cars.
They may also decide to bet on a first observation of the way the United States will go, not just in terms of wireless standards but also general patent rights.This week a confirmed hearing of candidates for the presidential nomination of the director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) The Supreme Court will hear the case of 'Oil States', which may change the entire US patent system. Global company lawyers, happy to say: 5G dispute is just the beginning.