Intel has been a dominance in the processor industry for a long time, squeezing toothpaste is comfortable, has not experienced the taste of competition for a long time, and quiet for a long time AMD jumped out last year gave Intel head a note pan.
The introduction of Ryzen has given Intel unprecedented pressure on both its desktop and mobile processors to pose a tremendous threat to Intel's performance, not to mention Intel's slightly lower pricing.
But this looks very cost-effective Ryzen in the end how?
This time we chose two notebooks with the same positioning, one equipped with Intel's eighth-generation Core i5-8250U processor, the other is equipped with a Rui Long 5 2500U, let us look at the data through the comparison of these two Processor in the end how kind!
Let's take a look at the CPU-Z from the book data for both processors.
From the figure we can see the details of the two processors, both of which have adopted a 4-core 8-thread, 14-nanometer production process, because it is low-voltage processor, TDP is 15W design.
In terms of the basic frequency, Intel eighth-generation Core i5-8250U is 1.6GHz, while the Rui Long 5 2500U is 2.0GHz.
In running through the CPUZ process, i5-8250U either single processor or multi-processor results are slightly higher than the Rui Long 5 2500U, i5-8250U running score of single core 403.6, multi-core 1917.7, and Rui Long 5 2500U Run score of 329.7 for a single core, multi-core 1663.7.
Intel would be stronger than AMD by 22.4% if single-core results, and multi-core scores would be 15.2% stronger.
CineBench R15
In addition to the CPU-Z, we also used the Cinebench R15 software to test two laptops. The Cinebench R15 not only tests the performance of the CPU, but also examines the graphics on both PCs, but here we do not Do the evaluation.
After all, there is a carrying MX150 graphics card, we can also run from sub-run Rui Long 5 2500U significant difference between the nuclear and the MX150 alone is still great.
Among the test results we can see that the performance of these two processors are almost the same, i5-8250U score 531cb and Rui Long 5 2500U score 533cb, this gap can be said to be negligible.
In the single-core run points, i5-8250U score of 148cb and Ruili 5 2500U score of 130cb, a 13% difference.
4K video playback
Play 4K video for the hardware is also a certain requirement, but for these two relative to the relatively new processor, there is no problem. Let us look at playing 4K video when the occupation of these two processors Rate it.
↑↑↑ 上: i5-8250U 下: Rui Long 5 2500U
As you can see in the two figures above, both were able to handle 4K video playback with ease and at a full screen CPU usage of only 3%. As a cheap editor, I was at When playing 4K video, frequently switching windows, in this case the CPU occupancy rate is only reached 30%, 31%.
So watching the video process, the performance of these two processors or less.
unzip
Decompression is a relatively CPU-consuming operation, I believe you have played the game under the players know, after each download finished the game but also after a long decompression in order to successfully enter the game.
Here I chose a game to decompress, take a look at both the processor takes how long it takes.
Here I extract is a called "Dishonored 2" game, the game size is about 23GB.
Through time we can see that the i5-8250U left time of 6 minutes and 39 seconds, and the right of the Ruilong 5 2500U need 6 minutes and 16 seconds, in the decompression of this test, AMD's Rui Long 5 2500U is To be ahead of the i5-8250U.
PS Import photos
Uncompressible is not fun? It does not matter, this time we come to more ruthless. In Photoshop, one-time load 100 4K photos to see if they can handle it?
From the time point of view, i5-8250U the import time is much smaller than the Rui Long 5 2500U of time, in the early introduction of these two computers have a period of time did not respond.
But equipped with i5-8250U significantly faster recovery of the computer to recover faster, the final load time is i5-8250U faster, time is 1 minute 11 seconds 7. The Rui Long 5 2500U is relatively slow, Time is 1 minute 55 seconds 2.
Temperature test
Temperature is also an important assessment of the pros and cons of a processor. In this test, I chose AIDA64 for high load testing of the processor to see the temperature after a half hour test.
From the test results, Rui Long 5 2500U temperature was significantly better than i5-8250U, after half an hour of copy machine temperature 56 ℃, and i5-8250U temperature of 62 ℃.
Both products are low-voltage processors, so both the frequency or the TDP is not very high, so both the processor temperature control are very good.
PCMark 8
The last test I chose PCMark 8, usually when testing the endurance results I will choose this software, but this software can also test the performance of the machine, where I chose the endurance test in home mode, but also be able to Know the ratings of both processors.
After a long wait, these two processor performance scores have come out, i5-8250U score of 2923 and Rui Long 5 2500U score of 2600, a difference of 12%.
Although the battery life does not directly reflect the performance of these two processors, but also the most reference point of view, equipped with i5-8250U of this computer life of up to 4 hours and 42 minutes while equipped with Rui Long 5 2500U battery life Not bad, reached 3 hours and 17 minutes, although still a difference of more than an hour, but such a result can be considered very good.
3DMark
Having shielded the MX 150 discrete graphics, I chose the Cloud Gate scene from 3DMark to test the performance of the integrated graphics for both processors, which is perfect for home use integrated graphics.
This result Well ... can only say that in the integrated graphics Rui Long 5 2500U and i5-8250U the gap is not large, a difference of 1700 points.
This run score than the seven generations of low-voltage processor i7-7200U even lower 1000 points, is it in graphics, Ruili 5 2500U integrated graphics is significantly weaker than the i5-8250U? It seems only in a Item tested.
Game test
For these two notebooks, the game may be the most detached right? But I still pulled out of the long-standing watch leader, after shielding the MX 150 discrete graphics, let me look at these two processors since With integrated graphics in the game, have what kind of performance!
Because it is to test the performance of the two integrated graphics, so do not have too much on the screen above the requirements, 1080P resolution I will adjust the picture quality to a minimum, the rendering fixed to 50%, all the characters look like Mosaic, but these small problems do not mind it, after all, not a game.
Through the above two frame statistics chart we can see that in the same settings and resolution of the case, equipped with Rui Long 5 2500U this computer has a better frame performance, the lower limit is higher than the high.
The range of fluctuations in the number of frames are not equipped with i5-8250U computer, the overall experience will be better.
to sum up
Through this series of tests, I believe we have their own views on these two processors, statistical results in the table below.
It is not difficult to see that the Rui Long 5 2500U results are still very good, although in the PS into the 4K photo test a big difference, but the other results can be said to be comparable to the Core i5-8250U tied.
However, due to the market choose Dell 5 2500U processor notebook, the price is significantly better than equipped with i5-8250U processor notebook.
In terms of price / performance can be said to be a major step ahead of Intel processors, so to Intel's pressure is great, after all, 'low cover hundred ugly' thing.
I do not know after reading the results contrast, what are the views of these two processors?
In the purchase of the time will choose to carry an Intel processor or notebook equipped with an AMD processor? Finally, one sentence, that is used to stick with the Intel C logo in the face of the trademark after AMD look at AMD's trademark ..... .AMD's trademark can be nice!
