Speaking of vivo X20 and X20Plus UD these two brothers, in addition to the screen size, the biggest difference may be added to the X20 Plus OIS optical image stabilization and image Cube independent DSP. Especially the latter, although the X20 also made use of Software Algorithms Image Cube technology, but compared with independent DSP, people always want to actually explore the difference where this is taking advantage of vivo X20Plus screen fingerprint version debut, so that the brothers fight a happy.
Because the two functions are mainly on the imaging impact, then we just look at the camera and video, the other for the time being ignore, while the special test, regardless of the difference between the two imaging style, only to discuss optical image stabilization and DSP image Rubik's Cube Impact on imaging.
The following proofs order, unless otherwise specified, are displayed first X20 Plus screen fingerprint version of the photos taken after X20 photos. At the same time except for special circumstances, both using automatic mode phone shooting, and even did not click the screen to focus, take the camera Autofocus to check the camera's focus strategy. (Click the image to view original image)
X20Plus UD ISO-50 f / 1.8 1 / 240s
X20 ISO-50 f / 1.8 1 / 263s
X20Plus UD ISO-50 f / 1.8 1 / 1156s
X20 ISO-50 f / 1.8 1 / 1547s
Through the two daytime proofs of the parameters we can see that in the light environment is more adequate circumstances, both the ISO will be at a relatively low level, to ensure image quality, while the X20Plus with its own OIS optical image stabilization, The same lighting environment can always be the shutter speed is lowered a little lower, in the amount of light into the first machine, reflected in the actual photos, is the X20Plus photos always lighter than the X20 so little.
During the day and the basic picture can not pull the gap, after all, this grade camera phone, a good daytime shot is just a basic operation nothing more, let's increase the difficulty next to try different grades of dark scenes two mobile phone camera performance.
X20Plus UD ISO-295 f / 1.8 1 / 50s
X20 ISO-256 f / 1.8 1 / 50s
Came to dark light shooting environment, although the two phones are still very strong, but from the perspective of tolerance, blooming and other aspects, X20Plus or skill level up to 100% of the observation can be found, highlight the light box part , The X20Plus text is also clearly photographed, X20 has produced a high light overflow, the text box part of the details of the loss.This situation into the bottom of the light box 'property on the phone' is also obvious, X20 darkroom details than Brother also inferior a lot.
Talk about the parameters of the photo, in fact, the night shot X20Plus this tuning is a bit unexpected, because the ordinary optical anti-shake phone at night shot is usually take full advantage of the characteristics of optical image stabilization in ensuring the film out of the situation Under the shutter as slow as possible, while depressing the ISO, to ensure that the photos in a more sufficient amount of light into the case does not produce too much noise.But X20Plus strategy is almost the opposite, with the same exposure time, with optical Anti-shake it instead is using a higher sensitivity, in this case can have better into the film, the natural is independent of the image Cube DSP played a role. It seems the same technology, with hardware is to play more Better, the performance of the X20 has been very good, but your uncle is uncle after all, ah.
In advance, the next two proofs are manual control of the focus, focus and metering on the famous plaza four words of the light card .That play such a small advertisement, where should I get advertising costs ah.
X20Plus UD ISO-286 f / 1.8 1 / 50s
X20 ISO-305 f / 1.8 1 / 50s
Although deliberately put the metering point on the bright down the overall brightness of the photo, but the perception of the purity of the screen is still very high. Proofs in the big picture performance basically the same, both photos showed a very good tolerance Degree, the overall picture noise control well.
Magnified to 100% of the observations, you can see or X20Plus UD even better performance in the focus and metering are the same circumstances, it proof proof part overflow control is exemplary, the text on the roadside stop sign is also clearly visible (Though again an advertisement ...).
Next to avoid the fairy fight, we see we overwhelmed, the introduction of a third machine Xiaobian main machine - millet 6, millet as a step to the rise of the camera, although the camera 6 slightly inferior to their own millet Note 3 , But as a reference player is absolutely no problem.
X20Plus UD ISO-661 f / 1.8 1 / 33s
X20 ISO * 609 f / 1.8 1 / 33s
MI 6 ISO-1000 f / 1.8 1 / 17s
This group of pictures m 6 performance is a typical optical image stabilization in the night shot in the tuning orientation, the same aperture in the case, try to extend the exposure time, or even reached 1/17 seconds. Of course, the overall performance Said that both the glare control or the sky's noise control than the two vivo are still some gaps (the lens to confirm the wipe clean, glare even slightly adjusted angle is still serious.) For street lighting glare, X20Plus UD The proofs both glare range or light source resolution are the best, eye-catching performance.
In order to restore the face, let's come back with a group of proofs with millet, this also deliberately opened the night view of rice 6 enhanced.
X20Plus UD ISO-676 f / 1.8 1 / 20s (Full Auto Focus)
X20Plus UD ISO-488 f / 1.8 1 / 50s (Focusing Point Street Light Bulb)
X20 ISO-756 f / 1.8 1 / 25s (Full Auto Focus)
X20 ISO-315 f / 1.8 1 / 50s (focus on street light bulbs)
MI 6 ISO-1000 f / 1.8 1 / 17s (enhanced night vision, full autofocus)
MI 6 ISO-400 f / 1.8 1 / 40s (Night scene enhanced, focusing on street light bulbs)
This set of proofs, in the case of manual focus meters 6 performance is good, bright control is good, the entire screen noise control is also a lot better than the case of full auto focus at the same time this set of proofs finally see X20Plus UD use optical anti-shake to extend the exposure time to increase the amount of light, brightness and purity better than the rest of the two, it appears X20Plus UD tuning mode in the scene is still relatively flexible, do not go all the way to black.
If you take a picture of the high dependence on independent DSP, X20Plus UD rely on the hardware to win, that in order to further test the optical image stabilization play, let's take a look at the performance of two mobile phones in video recording, the following video material , Students can not directly load the flash player can click on the B station link jump H5 playback.
https://www.bilibili.com/video/av19015568/
To be honest, the video gap is actually smaller than Xiaobian predicted that although there is no optical image stabilization, but the X20's picture is basically stable, as strenuous exercise of the upper and lower steps and running part, or optical anti-shake X20Plus UD performance even stronger. However Xiaobian want to say is that after reading the rocks of the four major freeze-thaw test, I think in Harbin only 33 degrees wearing an ancestral sweater that rock crush all mobile phones.
As the saying goes, X20Plus UD really do their own hardware and software are very good strength, combined with even more has a dazzling high output, maybe this phone, Xiaobian only resentment is 6.43 inches such a large screen, but also to maintain In 1080P this can only say that the general level of resolution.
Speaking of vivo X20 and X20Plus UD these two brothers, in addition to the screen size, the biggest difference may be added to the X20 Plus OIS optical image stabilization and image Cube independent DSP. Especially the latter, although the X20 also made use of Software Algorithms Image Cube technology, but compared with independent DSP, people always want to actually explore the difference where this is taking advantage of vivo X20Plus screen fingerprint version debut, so that the brothers fight a happy.
Because the two functions are mainly on the imaging impact, then we just look at the camera and video, the other for the time being ignore, while the special test, regardless of the difference between the two imaging style, only to discuss optical image stabilization and DSP image Rubik's Cube Impact on imaging.
The following proofs order, unless otherwise specified, are displayed first X20 Plus screen fingerprint version of the photos taken after X20 photos. At the same time except for special circumstances, both using automatic mode phone shooting, and even did not click the screen to focus, take the camera Autofocus to check the camera's focus strategy. (Click the image to view original image)
X20Plus UD ISO-50 f / 1.8 1 / 240s
X20 ISO-50 f / 1.8 1 / 263s
X20Plus UD ISO-50 f / 1.8 1 / 1156s
X20 ISO-50 f / 1.8 1 / 1547s
Through the two daytime proofs of the parameters we can see that in the light environment is more adequate circumstances, both the ISO will be at a relatively low level, to ensure image quality, while the X20Plus with its own OIS optical image stabilization, The same lighting environment can always be the shutter speed is lowered a little lower, in the amount of light into the first machine, reflected in the actual photos, is the X20Plus photos always lighter than the X20 so little.
During the day and the basic picture can not pull the gap, after all, this grade camera phone, a good daytime shot is just a basic operation nothing more, let's increase the difficulty next to try different grades of dark scenes two mobile phone camera performance.
X20Plus UD ISO-295 f / 1.8 1 / 50s
X20 ISO-256 f / 1.8 1 / 50s
Came to dark light shooting environment, although the two phones are still very strong, but from the perspective of tolerance, blooming and other aspects, X20Plus or skill level up to 100% of the observation will be able to find that highlight of the light box , The X20Plus text is also clearly photographed, X20 has produced a high light overflow, the text box part of the details of the loss.This situation into the bottom of the light box 'property on the phone' is also obvious, X20 darkroom details than Brother also inferior a lot.
Talk about the parameters of the photo, in fact, the night shot X20Plus this tuning is a bit unexpected, because the ordinary optical anti-shake phone at night shot is usually take full advantage of the characteristics of optical image stabilization in ensuring the film out of the situation Under the shutter as slow as possible, while depressing the ISO, to ensure that the photos in a more sufficient amount of light into the case does not produce too much noise.But X20Plus strategy is almost the opposite, with the same exposure time, with optical Anti-shake it instead is using a higher sensitivity, in this case can have better into the film, the natural is independent of the image Cube DSP played a role. It seems the same technology, with hardware is to play more Better, the performance of the X20 has been very good, but your uncle is uncle after all, ah.
In advance, the next two proofs are manual control of the focus, focus and metering on the famous plaza four words on the light card .That play such a small advertisement, where should I get advertising costs ah.
X20Plus UD ISO-286 f / 1.8 1 / 50s
X20 ISO-305 f / 1.8 1 / 50s
Although deliberately put the metering point on the bright down the overall brightness of the photo, but the perception of the purity of the screen is still very high. Proofs in the big picture performance basically the same, both photos showed a very good tolerance Degree, the overall picture noise control well.
Magnified to 100% of the observations, you can see or X20Plus UD even better performance in the focus and metering are the same circumstances, it proof proof part overflow control is exemplary, the text on the roadside stop sign is also clearly visible (Though again an advertisement ...).
Next to avoid the fairy fight, we see we overwhelmed, the introduction of a third machine Xiaobian main machine - millet 6, millet as a step to the rise of the camera, although the camera 6 slightly inferior to their own millet Note 3 , But as a reference player is absolutely no problem.
X20Plus UD ISO-661 f / 1.8 1 / 33s
X20 ISO * 609 f / 1.8 1 / 33s
MI 6 ISO-1000 f / 1.8 1 / 17s
This group of pictures m 6 performance is a typical optical image stabilization in the night shot in the tuning orientation, the same aperture in the case, try to extend the exposure time, or even reached 1/17 seconds. Of course, the overall performance Said that both the glare control or the sky's noise control than the two vivo are still some gaps (the lens to confirm the wipe clean, glare even slightly adjusted angle is still serious.) For street lighting glare, X20Plus UD The proofs both glare range or light source resolution are the best, eye-catching performance.
In order to restore the face, let's come back with a group of proofs with millet, this also deliberately opened the night view of rice 6 enhanced.
X20Plus UD ISO-676 f / 1.8 1 / 20s (Full Auto Focus)
X20Plus UD ISO-488 f / 1.8 1 / 50s (Focusing Point Street Light Bulb)
X20 ISO-756 f / 1.8 1 / 25s (Full Auto Focus)
X20 ISO-315 f / 1.8 1 / 50s (focus on street light bulbs)
MI 6 ISO-1000 f / 1.8 1 / 17s (enhanced night vision, full autofocus)
MI 6 ISO-400 f / 1.8 1 / 40s (Night scene enhanced, focusing on street light bulbs)
This set of proofs, in the case of manual focus meters 6 performance is good, bright control is good, the entire screen noise control is also a lot better than the case of full auto focus at the same time this set of proofs finally see X20Plus UD use optical anti-shake to extend the exposure time to increase the amount of light, brightness and purity better than the rest of the two, it appears X20Plus UD tuning mode in the scene is still relatively flexible, do not go all the way to black.
If you take a picture of the high dependence on independent DSP, X20Plus UD rely on the hardware to win, that in order to further test the optical image stabilization play, let's take a look at the performance of two mobile phones in video recording, the following video material , Students can not directly load the flash player can click on the B station link jump H5 playback.
https://www.bilibili.com/video/av19015568/
To be honest, the video gap is actually smaller than Xiaobian predicted that although there is no optical image stabilization, but the X20's picture is basically stable, as strenuous exercise of the upper and lower steps and running part, or optical anti-shake X20Plus UD performance even stronger. However Xiaobian want to say is that after reading the rocks of the four major freeze-thaw test, I think in Harbin only 33 degrees wearing an ancestral sweater that rock crush all mobile phones.
As the saying goes, X20Plus UD really do their own hardware and software are very good strength, combined with even more has a dazzling high output, maybe this phone, Xiaobian only resentment is 6.43 inches such a large screen, but also to maintain In 1080P this can only say that the general level of resolution.
