AMD Vega has just come out difficult, not catch up with the shadow of competing products, the yellow boss once again move, suddenly released a new generation of flagship card Titan V, based on 12nm new technology, Volta's new architecture, the core of the GV100.
Although it is strictly a semi-pro card, it will not be mass-market, unlike the GTX series that is suitable for games, but after all, it represents NVIDIA's top design standards and we are still curious about what it takes to play the game.
Based on the highest-specification GV100 core, the Titan V integrates 21.1 billion transistors with 5120 CUDA cores, 640 Tensor cores and 320 texture units with a core frequency of 1200-1455 MHz and single-precision floating point performance of 15TFlops, along with 3072-bit 12GB BHM2 memory, the equivalent frequency of 1.7GHz, bandwidth 653GB / s, thermal design power 250W (8 + 6 pin power supply).
Asking price as high as 3,000 US dollars, about 20,000 yuan, while in the domestic e-commerce platform, there are sellers offer sea up to 29,999 yuan.
GamersNexus in the dismantling of the Titan V, it conducted a more detailed game test, The main target for comparison is Titan Xp, the blood of the Pascal family , 3840 stream processors, acceleration frequency of 1582MHz, with 384-bit 12GB GDDR5X memory bandwidth of 548GB / s, the price of 1,200 US dollars.
First in overclocking, By default, the 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme looping machine test, the peak core frequency of 1682MHz, overheating down an average of 1507MHz.
The fan speed increased to 90%, the average core frequency back to 1605MHz, the other unchanged.Continue to increase the fan speed and release the power limit, the average frequency of up to 1672MHz.
The end result is the core frequency, memory frequency offset are 200MHz, the fan speed is maintained at 100%, the core temperature of 81-84 ℃.
Test will examine the silent frequency, overclocking different state, platform with Core i7-7700K OC 4.5GHz processor.
3DMark Time Spy graphics score, Titan V more than 12300, leading Titan Xp 22%, while leading overclocked GTX 1080 Ti 14%.
Titan Xp leading the two graphics sub-test were also 23%, 20-21%.
The 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra is only about 7% ahead of the Titan Xp, which overclocks and leads the overclocked GTX 1080 Ti 16%.
In the two graphical subtest tests, Titan V leads in the first and second in the lead, resulting in a total score of not too much higher.
Then enter the game test session, "Doom", 4K resolution, Vulkan API, asynchronous computing is turned on, Titan V ran out of 132FPS, Leading Titan Xp 41% , The latter can be overclocked off 17%, but if you look at the Titan V, you can soar to 157FPS.
However, Titan V frame delay here is relatively large, and driver optimization should not be in place.
"Sniper Elite 4", 4K / DX12 high-definition / asynchronous computing, Titan V easily ran out of 115FPS, Beyond Titan Xp 27% , The frame delay is not bad.
"Singularity ashes" in the CPU as a bottleneck, GTX 1080 Ti, Titan V, Titan Xp results are similar, about 98FPS.
Dedicated to running GPU test, 4K crazy picture quality, the power of Titan V came out, Moisture lead Titan Xp 10% , After overclocking reached 20%.
Titan V is still fierce in Hell Blade, Leading Titan Xp 37% , Overclocking effect is also very obvious.
"Ghost Recon: Wilderness" a bit strange, Titan V leads a small margin , And even GTX 1080 Ti are not too far away, only significantly increased frame rate significantly overclocking, but the frame delay has also increased.
2K resolution is also similar.
"Glory battle spirit" in the leading 14% , Almost no improvement after overclocking.
"Destiny 2" is also a DX11 game, Titan V nothing good.
And the Titan V often has a sudden increase in frame delays in the game for unknown reasons.
RX Vega 64 said very hurt.
