Let's take a look at a story that everyone may well know-Zuckerberg and Winklevoss both are sophomores at Harvard University, and at the same time they have the idea of social software. Then, the fate of several people came after 2003 Disagreement: ● 2003 Zuckerberg abandoned by his girlfriend, 6 hours after he and his classmates developed FaceMas on the line; when the same Winklevoss brothers hesitated to fully devote themselves to social networking sites; ● 2004 Zuckerberg announced Facebook quickly covered 29 schools, more than 75,000 users; Winklevoss brothers busy rowing training, and report to the principal Zuckerberg plagiarism; ● 2008 Facebook became one of the largest social software in the world with more than $ 265 million in revenue and a valuation of $ 4 billion; Winklevoss v. Zuckerberg infringed $ 65 million ...... What is the right to infringement of things, everyone has a heart scale, there is no need to go into details here. Today we want to talk about is the speed of doing things .Each time has given people at the same level of intelligence seems similar Chances are good, but the real situation is still bad. In the final analysis, there are also some potential IQ, some IQ may only 110, but it can accurately capture the changes in the world, beat IQ values up to 140 but not The courage to start people. There are not many people in the world who are clever but do nothing, and you can see where you spend your time - the current choices are not good or bad, but the time is fair and you will always be given the result. ▌ 'Sometimes one step later is to lose a war, miss an era' A whole life, you will spend 30 years to sleep, 10 years of work, 6 months to see ads, 51 days to decide what to wear, 3 days to count all kinds of bills ... ... is not that a lot of time in their own unconsciously slipped away? When we see a project or someone that succeeds, 'If I did that ...' it would naturally come to mind, and if that idea came to life repeatedly, was it a sign that I missed Too much? Life is like a race in some places, only those who run fast; and those who are slow, even the end of the opportunity to have no, in fact, most of the reasons to remove talent is unprepared, not implemented, did not adhere to. Each cow has its own strengths, may be particularly good at strategy, may be particularly good at gathering good team ... ... Today, looking back to see most of the successful entrepreneurs, the execution of this point is common, it can even be said precisely It is this kind of execution that made them 'hit the Grand Canal.' Why, then, why are not you going to do it? Jeff Bezos said,'I know that when I was 80, I would never regret these attempts that I had done, and I would not regret it in the area of the Internet where I think it would be a big deal.I know that even if I I will not regret if I failed, but I may eventually regret it because I did not try. Most procrastination comes from subconscious prioritization, and half is fear. To achieve an idea is often an exit from the comfort zone for the individual, and once it begins, it means declaring war on yourself - it is the responsibility of all the new things that are to be confronted, the uncertainties, and the possible future failure. Popular article called 'Do not mistake the platform as their own ability', maybe you have a high position in the big platform, but to leave these aura, whether everything is still so successful? This choice is probably half the execution of the people - the fear of setbacks, fear of failure, fear of giving, afraid of nothing, so simply do nothing. Never dared to challenge themselves in life, mediocrity may have become a result of a large probability. On the other hand, the fear comes from the outside world, people are social animals, it is hard to say that some people really do not care about the evaluation of others, the elephant association has described in the article an 'embarrassing typical' - whether you are just left School gate, or have accumulated experience in the workplace, as long as you step into the torrent of Internet entrepreneurship, basically you have been classified as 'liar, idiot and crazy' in the ranks. ▌ 'Do not do tangled things, into the device who does not grumble grumble' The beginning is always the most difficult, even if the beginning of a difficult start is a sign of things sail; take this step, you succeed in half. There is a classic saying in "Winning Drags": "I know I have a lot of time to play, and I choose to start with an imperfect little step." The same is true for the Minimum Viable Product theory, which is prevalent in the internet community. Minimizing Feasibility Product is not a product, but a process of testing your guesswork and assuring the product's needs. When developing a product, make a simple prototype that passes The test collects feedback, quickly updates, and constantly fixes it to finally come up with a product that fits the needs of the market. The prototype in this process is to minimize the viability of the product. Some people say: Zuckerberg who has a unique straightforward programmers: The idea? OK, the next second immediately to do! Problems? OK, the next second immediate solution! A better solution? OK, the next second immediately knock code for product iteration! Yes, it is the next second, even the next second, the next second are late. It is so swift and violent - the height of life is never the perfect thing to do, but the speed of doing things. ▌ 'God is fair, rich people are only 24 hours a day, but ...' Despite this, everybody's choices are still different: Elon Musk, a respectably entrepreneurial but still upset by love, worked more than 100 hours a week, and he also needed time to spend with his five sons; the man manages Testers La, Space X and Solar City, in order to solve the traffic jam problem he also has a company called Boring Company ...... His employees describe him as such: our discussions are both efficient and straightforward and based on factual arguments; working with him, everyone must take the initiative to get the job done and pause in the question that Elon can not tolerate ; Work block, or cross-sectoral order obstruction, his words hanging around 'there is a problem dial me straight at any time, I do not care what the problem is in the end, I have to solve the' ... ... Abstract point of view, Elon Musk, a seemingly turbulent outsider, is just going to be in trouble. Most of the time, the difference between excellence and mediocrity is the difference between executive power and control. So what kind of life do you want?
|