But what if a piece of art, music, literature, photography, or other work was not created by man but by an artificial intelligence robot? One judge in California last year dealt with a lawsuit, Surrounded by whether or not a monkeys in Sulawesi, Indonesia, own a copyrighted photograph, the lawsuit stems from the plea of a wildlife photographer, David Slater, who initially claimed that Wikipedia was using this photograph as a In fact, this photograph was taken before the camera in his absence, and the judge finally decided that Slater had infringed the monk's portrait rights and dismissed his petition.
Why is intellectual property mainly human-centered? There are many philosophical and other reasons for this. John Locke, in his study of natural rights in the seventeenth century, held that it is in the common interest of mankind to have natural rights to produce or labor products There are also many different economic reasons for this. The protection of intellectual property is essential for economic development, and if wisdom is not preserved, it is possible to prevent people from inventing and to allow the market to lose its dependable service. In the end, human development will also be affected.
This topic leads to the question of 'the value of wisdom', many of which depend on the extremely valuable ability of wisdom, including human progress, which should be protected as a value in itself and which in fact Is also one of the reasons for the establishment of intellectual property.In this perspective, perhaps we should think that artificial intelligence robots can have copyright, in order to protect the meaning we give wisdom.
It is noteworthy that the robotics field has made great strides in recent decades, and in the 1970s British artist Harold Cohen wrote an article about robotic art creation and developed AARON software to create amazing Abstractist Works. Igor Mordatch, a researcher at the University of California, Berkeley, has developed an algorithm that allows robots to learn and figure out the best way to accomplish their goals.
Although we refer to these capabilities of robots as 'wisdom,' many are unwilling to support the idea that AI robots can own copyrights, and those who oppose it think that intellectual property is not just about protecting wisdom itself. Its goals Is a special form of intelligence protection, and they argue that what artificial intelligence robots are doing is merely implementing a program or algorithm written by a human programmer, so artificial intelligence robots should not grant any intellectual property.
From this perspective, humans should be acclaimed for their artificial intelligence system because, after all, humankind has created them, what is the value of wisdom inherent and itself? One of the many determinants of this question is likely to stem from wisdom A rapid development of the importance of the world.
Artificial intelligence robots will become more and more similar to humans, and in the future they will become more capable of learning, more complex and better at providing complex solutions and manufacturing, and they will be better at doing something that is essential to our daily routine You might think that if we want to protect the value of wisdom, we must think AI as a group that can own intellectual property, otherwise we risk the idea of splitting wisdom.
The EU has acknowledged the importance of having an AI system machine and the importance of a future robot and calls for consideration of the civil law statutes that create robots. Intellectual property may therefore be given to robots, especially given that the EU has recognized the need to set special legal status for robots .
Let us not forget that robots have become more and more humanized, for example Sofia, the humanoid robot that is a Saudi Arabian citizen, claiming she wants a child, it seems clear that while robots may not be able to acquire intellectual property , But very few things can violate the value of the wisdom we give.