Down the altar? Huawei Mate 10 Pro camera measured!

I believe today's article title has enough eye-catching .This evaluation does not nonsense, do not wash the floor, all measured results prevail .First direct description of the theme:

Huawei Mate 10 Pro DxOMark camera test to get 100 points, whether there is any moisture?

Some pollen may come here already sit still: DxOMark mobile phone ranking Niudu machine so much, why suspect there is a problem Mate 10 Pro?

There are two reasons for this: The first is the Mate 10 Pro, which turned out to be a big plus after passing the 'thinning gate', 'flash gate' and '5G WiFi gate', and the second is our experience During the photo shoot of Mate 10 Pro, after observing its proofing performance, subjectively it does not think its proofing performance can beat HTC U11 or Samsung Galaxy S8.

So today we invited a flagship HTC U11 (DxOMark camera 90) and a domestic camera phone vivo X20Plus (DxOMark not tested), take a look at Huawei Mate 10 Pro can successfully hang These two.

Before the proof test, we should first review the questions raised at the beginning of the article.To find out the answer, we must not only make comparisons between the facts and facts, but also hold two points:

1, DxOMark camera test score what is the standard;

2, DxOMark gave Huawei Mate 10 Pro 100 points.

First look at the first one. We are here directly released DxOMark evaluation Huawei Mate 10 Pro article screenshot:

You can see, DxOMark evaluation of a cell phone camera, the camera quality should be divided into many projects, based on the performance of these projects comprehensive scoring.These projects include:

Exposure & Contrast, Color, Autofocus, Texture, Noise, Artifacts, Flash, Zoom, Ability) and Bokeh (bokeh ability).

Among the many projects, Huawei Mate 10 Pro scored four high scores, including autofocus capability (96 points), screen brightness and latitude (88 points), color reproduction (86 points) and flashing lights (84 points ).

We start directly below the proofs of the corresponding scenes comparative analysis, as the only two HTC U11 models involved in the DxOMark test, so we only give the corresponding score of U11: 90 AF autofocus, screen brightness and latitude 86 points, 83 points color reproduction, flash 79. Not difficult to find, these four scores, Mate 10 Pro are higher than the U11.

Comparison of the first set of proofs, the first color white balance these things aside, only to see the brightness and latitude Huawei Mate 10 Pro and HTC U11 exposure level is similar to highlight part (sky) brightness is basically the same, but the former dark part brightness Easily beat the latter; vivo X20Plus the highest brightness of the dark, but the upper left corner of the screen part of the sky is too exposed, can only be considered automatic mode exposure more radical, tolerance is not enough.

Comparison of the second set of proofs, Huawei Mate 10 Pro and HTC U11 exposure is still the same level, the former tolerance is still beating the latter; but vivo X20Plus aggressive exposure settings in the overall darker environment more popular, successfully defeated Huawei Mate 10 Pro.

The Huawei Mate 10 Pro exposure level closer to the vivo X20Plus, the upper left corner of both proofs have appeared over the exposure, but the Mate 10 Pro darker higher brightness, it is clear that its camera dynamic range even better; HTC U11 although Suppressed exposure so that the sky does not appear overexposed, but the dark details have been almost invisible.

Comparison of these three sets of proofs illustrates a problem: Huawei Mate 10 Pro can be more flexible according to different scenarios to adjust the exposure level, and has the HTC U11 and vivo X20Plus above the dynamic range; the latter two dynamic range are basically the same level .

But is it really so?

Through a more in-depth experience, we found that Huawei Mate 10 Pro will be forced to turn on the HDR when you take pictures, and you can not turn it off, but to HDR powerless big backlight scenes, the proofs of three phones is this:

When shooting this set of proofs, we forcibly opened the vivo X20Plus and HTC U11 HDR, to ensure that the three phones in the same starting line.At this time, Huawei Mate 10 Pro and HTC U11 are almost beyond the control of the spill, but the latter screen Resolution and darkness are directly spike the former; and in the previous three sets of proofs and the performance of the HTC U11 close to the vivo X20Plus, not only come up with the brightness of the dark and U11 similar, but also the blooming control very well in place. Obviously, In extremely high-contrast scenarios, the Huawei Mate 10 Pro outperformed the other two models in a straightforward manner; however, in most scenarios, Mate 10 Pro's "default HDR" is really useful and natural.

The question here is whether DxOMark's rating actually takes into account the extreme scenario? Whatever the answer to this question, the fact is that DxO ignores the ultimate scenario either intentionally or unintentionally, or considers the Huawei Mate 10 Pro to perform well in other scenarios This can be completely over-riddled - the 'screen brightness and latitude' score for the Mobile 10 Pro is not only 2 points higher than the HTC U11, but also 2 points behind the iPhone X.

Color reproduction, DxOMark hit the score is uncontested.This set of proofs, vivo X20Plus and HTC U11 a partial purple a green, only the Huawei Mate 10 Pro try to restore a near real color, this item in the DxOMark Get 86 points deserved.

Came night, this set of proofs contrast vivo X20Plus anti-dominated, the details of its screen sharpness and HTC U11 similar to the noise control effect is close to Huawei Mate 10 Pro, is completely take both director.In the DxOMark test, HTC U11 resolution Power score 74, noise score 62; Huawei Mate 10 Pro resolving power score 67, noise score 71. Sample proof from the actual point of view, this score is also very convincing.

For mobile phones, turning on the flash, how to set the exposure more accurately, while making the noise into pieces less, more accurate white balance is a big problem - for domestic mobile phones is even more so from this group On the flash proofs, the white balance of the Huawei Mate 10 Pro was so warm that it could not properly restore the color of the picture, which did not match with the description of 'accurate and repeatable' in the DxOMark evaluation article. However, there was no open proof in Mate 10 Pro There is color noise, and vivo X20Plus and HTC U11 proofs have a large piece of color noise here 84 points and 79 points is no longer the focus of comparison, DxOMark articles and the results of the test is the result of access.

As for the autofocus capability, Huawei Mate 10 Pro contrast + 2PD + laser luxury specifications, 2PD focus 'make a mistake' in high contrast and dark scenes, laser focus can be effectively complemented, the whole scene focus speed and success rate of two Opponent.

Finally, let's talk about our opinion on Huawei Mate 10 Pro camera quality and DxOMark score.The camera has the accurate color, high resolution and latitude in the daytime general scene imaging, powerful focusing ability; but the dark Scenes are heavily smeared, large details are missing, and the typical 'Night Dragonworm' is dead. Most of the reviews made by DxOMark for the Mate 10 Pro are impeccable, but such a nightly imaging shorthand can get 100 , In terms of scores, is it worth considering scrutiny?

I believe today's article title has enough eye-catching .This evaluation does not nonsense, do not wash the floor, all measured results prevail .First direct description of the theme:

Huawei Mate 10 Pro DxOMark camera test to get 100 points, whether there is any moisture?

Some pollen may come here already sit still: DxOMark mobile phone ranking Niudu machine so much, why suspect Mate 10 Pro have a problem?

There are two reasons for this: The first is the Mate 10 Pro, which turned out to be a big plus after passing the 'thinning gate', 'flash gate' and '5G WiFi gate', and the second is our experience During the photo shoot of Mate 10 Pro, after observing its proofing performance, subjectively it does not think its proofing performance can beat HTC U11 or Samsung Galaxy S8.

So today we invited a flagship HTC U11 (DxOMark camera 90) and a domestic camera phone vivo X20Plus (DxOMark not tested), take a look at Huawei Mate 10 Pro can successfully hang These two.

Before the proof test, we should first review the questions raised at the beginning of the article.To find out the answer, we must not only make a comparison between solid and actual situation, but also have two points:

1, DxOMark camera test score what is the standard;

2, DxOMark gave Huawei Mate 10 Pro 100 points.

First look at the first one. We are here directly released DxOMark evaluation Huawei Mate 10 Pro article screenshot:

You can see, DxOMark evaluation of a cell phone camera, the camera quality should be divided into many projects, based on the performance of these projects comprehensive scoring.These projects include:

Exposure & Contrast, Color, Autofocus, Texture, Noise, Artifacts, Flash, Zoom, Ability) and Bokeh (bokeh ability).

Among the many projects, Huawei Mate 10 Pro scored four high scores, including autofocus capability (96 points), screen brightness and latitude (88 points), color reproduction (86 points) and flashing lights (84 points ).

We start directly below the proofs of the corresponding scenes comparative analysis, as the only two HTC U11 models involved in the DxOMark test, so we only give the corresponding score of U11: 90 AF autofocus, screen brightness and latitude 86 points, 83 points color reproduction, flash 79. Not difficult to find, these four scores, Mate 10 Pro are higher than the U11.

Comparison of the first set of proofs, the first color white balance these things aside, only to see the brightness and latitude Huawei Mate 10 Pro and HTC U11 exposure level is similar to highlight part (sky) brightness is basically the same, but the former dark part brightness Easily beat the latter; vivo X20Plus the highest brightness of the dark, but the upper left corner of the screen part of the sky is too exposed, can only be considered automatic mode exposure more radical, tolerance is not enough.

Comparison of the second set of proofs, Huawei Mate 10 Pro and HTC U11 exposure is still the same level, the former tolerance is still beating the latter; but vivo X20Plus aggressive exposure settings in the overall darker environment more popular, successfully defeated Huawei Mate 10 Pro.

The Huawei Mate 10 Pro exposure level closer to the vivo X20Plus, the upper left corner of both proofs have appeared over the exposure, but the Mate 10 Pro darker higher brightness, it is clear that its camera dynamic range even better; HTC U11 although Suppressed exposure so that the sky does not appear overexposed, but the dark details have been almost invisible.

Comparison of these three sets of proofs illustrates a problem: Huawei Mate 10 Pro can be more flexible according to different scenarios to adjust the exposure level, and has the HTC U11 and vivo X20Plus dynamic range above; the dynamic range of the latter two are basically the same level .

But is it really so?

Through a more in-depth experience, we found that Huawei Mate 10 Pro will force open the HDR when taking pictures, and you can not turn it off, but to the HDR powerless big backlight scenes, the proofs of three phones is this:

When shooting this set of proofs, we forcibly opened the vivo X20Plus and HTC U11 HDR, to ensure that the three phones in the same starting line.At this time, Huawei Mate 10 Pro and HTC U11 are almost beyond the control of the spill, but the latter screen Resolution and darkness are directly spike the former; and in the previous three sets of proofs and the performance of the HTC U11 close to the vivo X20Plus, not only come up with the brightness of the dark and U11 similar, but also the blooming control very well in place. Obviously, In extremely high-contrast scenarios, the Huawei Mate 10 Pro outperformed the other two models in a straightforward manner; however, in most scenarios, Mate 10 Pro's "default HDR" is really useful and natural.

The question here is whether DxOMark's rating actually takes into account the extreme scenario? Whatever the answer to this question, the fact is that DxO ignores the ultimate scenario either intentionally or unintentionally, or considers the Huawei Mate 10 Pro to perform well in other scenarios This can be completely over-riddled - the 'screen brightness and latitude' score for the Mobile 10 Pro is not only 2 points higher than the HTC U11, but also 2 points behind the iPhone X.

Color reproduction, DxOMark hit the score is uncontested.This set of proofs, vivo X20Plus and HTC U11 a partial purple a green, only the Huawei Mate 10 Pro try to restore a near real color, this item in the DxOMark Get 86 points deserved.

Came night, this set of proofs contrast vivo X20Plus anti-dominated, the details of its screen sharpness and HTC U11 similar to the noise control effect is close to Huawei Mate 10 Pro, is completely take both director.In the DxOMark test, HTC U11 resolution Power score 74, noise score 62; Huawei Mate 10 Pro resolving power score 67, noise score 71. Sample proof from the actual point of view, this score is also very convincing.

For mobile phones, turning on the flash, how to set the exposure more accurately, while making the noise into pieces less, more accurate white balance is a big problem - for domestic mobile phones is even more so from this group On the flash proofs, the white balance of the Huawei Mate 10 Pro was so warm that it could not properly restore the color of the picture, which did not match with the description of 'accurate and repeatable' in the DxOMark evaluation article. However, there was no open proof in Mate 10 Pro There is color noise, and vivo X20Plus and HTC U11 proofs have a large piece of color noise here 84 points and 79 points is no longer the focus of comparison, DxOMark articles and the results of the test is the result of access.

As for the autofocus capability, Huawei Mate 10 Pro contrast + 2PD + laser luxury specifications, 2PD focus 'make a mistake' in high contrast and dark scenes, laser focus can be effectively complemented, the whole scene focus speed and success rate of two Opponent.

Finally, let's talk about our opinion on Huawei Mate 10 Pro camera quality and DxOMark score.The camera has the accurate color, high resolution and latitude in the daytime general scene imaging, powerful focusing ability; but the dark Scenes are heavily smeared, large details are missing, and the typical 'Night Dragonworm' is dead. Most of the reviews made by DxOMark for the Mate 10 Pro are impeccable, but such a nightly imaging shorthand can get 100 , In terms of scores, is it worth considering scrutiny?