Recently, Haidian Court accepted these two cases.
RTS claims that the 'RTHK' and 'RK' mobile applications in the OPPO and vivo mobile phone stores use the RTS trademark directly in the mobile applications and initial page, and Published to the mobile application platform for the relevant public download.
In addition, the services provided by the 'People and Cars' App in the OPPO and vivo mobile phone stores are used car brokerage services, and the 'Renren' trademark enjoyed by the Renren car companies 'Brokerage' service is extremely similar, in fact, provided by the Ren RenBao, HuangBo endorsement App provides used car brokerage service exactly the same.
At the same time, opening up the 'People and Cars' App in the OPPO and vivo mobile phone stores is highly similar to the style, elements and combinations of the People's Car Company App icon. All are based on the orange color, On this background, 'Renren' is arranged in the middle of an orange background.
Renren car company that, OPPO and vivo unauthorized use of its used car brokerage service with 'same car' trademark the same or similar trademarks, causing confusion and misidentification of the relevant public, a serious violation of the ' People's car 'trademark rights; and in its platform fake' car 'App, use' people's car 'App high approximate design, background color, structure, easy to cause the public to be associated with the car company App, which is a huge number of erroneous downloads of used car service App of Car Corporation and infringes upon the rights and interests enjoyed by Renhe Car Corporation for its product-specific name, packaging and decoration, and constitutes unfair competition.
It is reported that the car company has repeatedly sent a letter of complaint and lawyer letter to the OPPO and vivo, OPPO and vivo requirements of the App Store shelves and disconnected, but OPPO and vivo received a letter ignored, did not take any Measures, resulting in the continuous loss of all car companies, OPPO and vivo should bear the tort liability.